Skip to main content

Table 4 Multilevel logistic analysis of factors associated with safe stool disposal

From: Correlates of appropriate disposal of children’s stools in Malawi: a multilevel analysis

Variable

Null model

Model I

aOR (95% CI)

Model II

aOR (95% CI)

Model III

aOR (95% CI)

Individual-level factors

 Sex of the child

  Male

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Female

 

0.92 (0.79–1.08)

 

0.93 (0.79–1.08)

 Age of the child (months)

   ≤ 5

 

1.00

 

1.00

  6–11

 

3.05 (2.51–3.70)

 

3.06 (2.52–3.72)

  12–17

 

6.79 (5.37–8.57)

 

6.81 (5.39–8.60)

  18–23

 

6.54 (5.15–8.31)

 

6.58 (5.18–8.35)

 Maternal age (years)

  15–24

 

1.00

 

1.00

  25–34

 

1.09 (0.84–1.41)

 

1.07 (0.83–1.38)

   ≥ 35

 

0.98 (0.69–1.38)

 

0.94 (0.67–1.33)

Number of children ever had

  1

 

1.00

 

1.00

  2

 

1.19 (0.94–1.08)

 

1.20 (0.95–1.53)

  3

 

0.87 (0.65–1.16)

 

0.89 (0.67–1.19)

  4+

 

0.91 (0.65–1.26)

 

0.94 (0.68–1.31)

 Maternal educational level

  No formal education

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Primary

 

0.91 (0.71–1.17)

 

0.83 (0.64–1.08)

  Secondary and higher

 

1.15 (0.83–1.60)

 

1.02 (0.73–1.62)

 Wealth

  Poor

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Middle

 

1.24 (0.99–1.53)

 

1.25 (1.01–1.55)

  Rich

 

1.32 (1.06–1.63)

 

1.28 (1.01–1.62)

 Employed

  No

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Yes

 

0.90 (0.76–1.08)

 

0.89 (0.75–1.06)

 Media exposure

  No

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Yes

 

1.21 (1.01–1.45)

 

1.20 (1.01–1.44)

 Religion

  Catholics

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Protestant

 

0.96 (0.74–1.24)

 

0.97 (0.75–1.25)

  Muslims and others

 

0.94 (0.76–1.16)

 

0.95 (0.77–1.17)

 Water source

  Unimproved

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Improved

 

1.29 (1.02–1.63)

 

1.23 (0.98–1.55)

 Sanitation type

  Unimproved

 

1.00

 

1.00

  Improved

 

1.38 (1.13–1.68)

 

1.36 (1.12–1.65)

Community-level factors

 Residence

  Urban

  

1.00

1.00

  Rural

  

0.67 (0.49–0.92)

0.73 (0.52–1.65)

 Region

  Northern

  

1.00

1.00

  Central

  

1.68 (1.27–2.23)

1.77 (1.31–2.38)

  Southern

  

1.42 (1.09–1.84)

1.55 (1.18–2.05)

 Community wealth

  Low

  

1.00

1.00

  Middle

  

1.08 (0.86–1.36)

1.05 (0.82–1.34)

  High

  

1.17 (0.85–1.54)

0.97 (0.71–1.84)

 Community women’s education

  Low

  

1.00

1.00

  Middle

  

1.63 (1.22–2.19)

1.62 (1.18–2.21)

  High

  

1.47 (1.18–1.83)

1.45 (1.14–1.84)

 Measures of variation

  Area variance (95% CI)

0.66 (0.49–0.90)

0.70 (0.51–0.96)

0.57 (0.41–0.79)

0.63 (0.45–0.88)

  ICC (%)

16.8

17.6

14.8

16.1

  PCV (%)

Ref.

−6.06

13.6

4.6

  MOR

2.18

2.22

2.06

2.14

 Model Fit statistic

  AIC

5309.53

4848.50

5278.58

4831.51

  1. Null model contains no explanatory variables; Model I includes individual-level factors only; Model II includes community-level factors only; Model III includes both individual-level and community-level factors
  2. aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence internal, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, MOR median odds ratio, PVC proportional change in variance, AIC Akaike information criterion