Skip to main content

Table 4 Table of effect findings comparing feedback letters plus additional resources

From: Communication of children’s weight status: what is effective and what are the children’s and parents’ experiences and preferences? A mixed methods systematic review

Review finding

Confidence in the evidence

Explanation of confidence in the evidence

Contributing studies

Source of information

E6: Parents receiving feedback letters plus additional resources had little or no difference in the way they perceive receiving help to reduce their child’s risk of overweight compared to parents receiving a standard feedback letter.

Moderate

Downgraded by 1 level due to unclear risk of bias

Bailey-Davies 2017 [50]

Content of information

E7: Parents receiving feedback letters plus additional resources had little or no difference in the way they perceive receiving the information/resources that help them understand their child’s weight status compared to parents receiving a standard feedback letter.

Moderate

Downgraded by 1 level due to unclear risk of bias

Bailey-Davies 2017 [50]

E8: Parents receiving feedback letters plus additional resources had little or no difference in their perception that they are receiving useful weight status information compared to parents receiving a standard feedback letter.

Low

Downgraded by 2 levels because of unclear risk of bias and imprecision.

Bailey-Davies 2017 [50]

Susceptibility of being overweight

E9: It is uncertain whether parents receiving feedback letters plus additional resources improved parent’s ability to classify their child’s weight status compared to parents receiving a standard feedback letter.

Very low

Downgraded by 3 levels due to study design, risk of bias and imprecision

Falconer 2014 [51, 52]

Perceived severity of being overweight

E10: It is uncertain whether parents receiving feedback letters plus additional resources improved parent’s ability to recognise the risks of obesity compared to parents receiving a standard feedback letter.

Very low

Downgraded by 3 levels due to study design, risk of bias and imprecision

Falconer 2014 [51, 52]

Cues to action

E11: It is uncertain whether parents receiving feedback letters plus additional resources contacted a healthcare provider compared to parents receiving a standard feedback letter.

Low

Downgraded by 2 levels because of unclear risk of bias and imprecision.

Bailey-Davies 2017 [50]

  1. *E stands for effect finding