From: Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
 | OR (95% CI) 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 | OR (95% CI) 1 vs. 2 | OR (95% CI) 1 vs 3 | OR (95% CI) 2 vs. 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group | ||||
 Telephone call-1 | 1.63 (1.34, 1.98)** | 1.33 (1.09, 1.63)** | 1.62 (1.33, 1.97)** | – |
 SMS-2 | 1.20 (1.00, 1.43)* | reference | – | 1.20 (1.01, 1.43)* |
 Control-3 | reference | – | reference | reference |
Gender | ||||
 Male | 1.25 (1.07, 1.45)* | 1.28 (1.05, 1.56)* | 1.19 (0.99, 1.44) | 1.24 (1.04, 1.48)* |
 Female | reference | Reference | reference | Reference |
Age | 1.02 (1.01, 1.03)** | 1.01 (1.00, 1.03)* | 1.03 (1.02, 1.04)** | 1.02 (1.10, 1.03)** |
Donation history | 1.06 (1.04, 1.08)** | 1.10 (1.06, 1.13)** | 1.05 (1.03, 1.07)** | 1.06 (1.04, 1.08)** |