Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of characteristics of included studies

From: The relationship between household chaos and child, parent, and family outcomes: a systematic scoping review

Study Characteristic

 

Na

Type of study

Cross-sectional

60

Longitudinal

49

Experimental/laboratory

2

Case-control

1

Sample Size

< 100

16

100- < 1000

72

1000- < 10,000

22

≥10,000

2

Cohort/Study

TEDS

12

FLP

9

Head Start Cohort

6

MCS +/− NESS

5

Pakistan cohort

5

Western Reserve Reading Project

4

Stand-alone Head Start Cohorts

4

Florida Twin Project OR from the Florida State Twin registry

2

SECCYD

2

SIBS

2

Early Alliance Trial

1

NAPLAN

1

BIDS

1

Early Growth and Development Study

1

ESM

1

FACES, 2006

1

Food and Family Project

1

Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study

1

Guelph Family Health Study

1

Home Environment Comparison Study

1

PHDCN

1

Social and Educational Change (RISE) study

1

Wisconsin Twin Project

1

L-CID

1

SIESTA

1

Social and Character Development Research Program

1

Stand-alone studies/No study or cohort name

46

Context/Participants

Low income/rural

34

Twins

19

Adopted children

Child Diagnosis/Risk factor:

1

ADHD

2

Autism

1

Obesity

2

DRD4 risk

1

Stuttering

1

Sickle cell disease

1

Type 1 diabetes

2

Parent Diagnosis/Risk factor:

 

Depression/

3

Bipolar disorder

2

ADHD symptomology

4

Measure of Household Chaos Construct

CHAOS long form

44

CHAOS short form

42

CHAOS adapted

10

Other – questionnaire and/or direct observation

16

  1. Studies were included multiple times, for example, if the study was conducted in more than one country, or a manuscript reported results from more than one study. Where data were taken from a longitudinal cohort but analysis was only conducted at one time point, studies were classified as cross-sectional. Where location of study was not reported, location of the first author was used, and where studies investigated participants as parent-child dyads, families, or twin pairs, the unit of participants was used for sample size reporting (e.g. 5000 twin pairs was reported as a sample size of 5000, and 75 parent-child dyads was reported as a sample size of 75)
  2. TEDS Twins Early Development Study, FLP Family Life Project, MCS Millennium Cohort Study, NESS National Evaluation of Sure Start Impact Study, SECCYD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, SIBS Sisters and Brothers Study, NAPLAN Australian Twin Study of the National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy, BIDS Ben-Gurio University Infant Developmental Study, ESM Early Steps Multisite project, FACES 2006 Family and Child Experiences Survey, 2006 cohort, PHDCN Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighbourhoods, L-CID Leiden Consortium on Individual Development, SIESTA Study of Infant’s Emergent Sleep TrAjectories, ADHD Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, DRD4 Dopamine Receptor D4
  3. aN = 112 studies reported in 111 manuscripts