Skip to main content

Table 1 Background characteristics of the participants (N = 689)

From: Low willingness to pay for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China

Items

N %

Mean ± SD

Backgrounds

 Age (years old)

  18–21

118

17.1

  22–25

193

28

  26–29

123

17.9

  30–33

91

13.2

   > 33

164

23.8

 Highest education obtained

  Middle school or lower

55

8.0

  High school

102

14.8

  Three-year college

137

19.9

  Bachelor’s degree or above

395

57.3

 Marital status

  Single

372

54.0

  Married (male-female marriage)

92

13.4

  Having boyfriends

179

26.0

  Divorced/widow/others

46

6.7

 Type of job

  Full time

438

63.6

  Part time

30

4.4

  Unemployed

221

32.1

 Personal monthly income (USD)

   < 141

76

11.0

  141–424

145

21.0

  425–849

254

36.9

  850–1132

100

14.5

  1133–1415

51

7.4

   > 1415

63

9.1

 Self-identified sexual orientation

  Homosexual

523

75.9

  Heterosexual

3

0.4

  Bisexual

131

19.0

  Others

32

4.6

 Age of first homosexual intercourse (years old)

   < 17

68

9.9

  17–18

123

17.9

  19–20

187

27.1

  21–25

189

27.4

  26–30

52

7.5

   > 30

70

10.2

Health status and service utilization

 Self-rated health status

  Poor/very poor

17

2.5

  Just fine

198

28.7

  Good/very good

474

68.8

The history of STI infection (Yes)

54

7.8

HIV status

  Negative

554

80.4

  Unknown

135

19.6

HIV testing ever (Yes)

563

81.7

Intention to test HIV status in the next six months

  Low intention

205

29.8

  High intention

484

70.2

Full disclosure of sexual orientation to hospital doctors (Yes)

44

6.4

Full disclosure of sexual orientation to CDC officers (Yes)

289

41.9

Full disclosure of sexual orientation to NGO peers (Yes)

136

19.7

Overall disclosure of sexual orientation to health professionalsa(0–3)

0.68 ± 0.87

  1. STI sexually transmitted infection, CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NGO Non-governmental Organization.
  2. aThe Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.534, and 1 factor explained 52.4% of the total variance;