Innovation diffusion: how homogenous networks influence the uptake of community-based injectable contraceptives

BMC Public Health

Table 5 Network density and degree centrality

Network	No. of ties present^a	Density	Ego’s degree centrality	Average degree centrality	Ego nBetweeness	Network Average nBetweeness	CBD injectable contraceptive use
SITE A (GOMBE)
SNA-A	84	0.76	9	7.64	4.37	2.45	8
SNA-B	96	0.87	10	8.73	2.14	1.34	10
SNA-C	50	0.46	8	4.55	23.07	4.80	4
SNA-D	94	0.86	7	8.55	1.56	1.62	7
SNA-E	108	0.98	10	9.82	0.25	0.20	10
SNA-F	88	0.98	5	8.00	4.58	1.99	7
SNA-G	86	0.78	7	7.82	2.56	2.41	5
SNA-H	92	0.84	8	8.37	1.60	2.29	8
SNA-I	92	0.84	8	8.36	1.15	1.67	9
SNA-J	74	0.67	7	6.73	3.11	2.80	8
SITE B (YEMALTU-DEBA)
SNA-K	74	0.67	10	6.73	16.41	2.36	10
SNA-L	110	1.00	10	10.00	0	0	10
SNA-M	110	1.00	10	10.00	0	0	9
SNA-N	76	0.69	10	6.91	9.78	2.80	10
SNA-O	82	0.75	10	7.45	10.63	2.05	10
SNA-P	56	0.51	10	5.09	30.56	2.95	10
SNA-Q	56	0.51	2	5.09	0	2.89	3
SNA-R	110	1.00	10	10.00	0	0	3
SNA-S	96	0.87	10	8.73	2.64	1.30	10
SNA-T	80	0.73	10	7.27	8.52	2.48	9

ISSN: 1471-2458