Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of the intervention on primary outcomes from the DID analysis

From: Impact of the village health center project on contraceptive behaviors in rural Jordan: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis

Variable

Intervention group (%)

Control group (%)

Difference

Assumptiona

DID

P-value

Baseline

Endline

P-value

Baseline

Endline

P-value

e

f

(e – f)

 

(N = 510)

(N = 508)

 

(N = 509)

(N = 534)

     

a

b

 

c

d

 

b − a

d − c

  

Use of VHCs’ services

 FP counseling

0.2

4.9

0.001

2.4

3.0

0.52

4.7

0.6

4.1

0.004

 Obtaining contraceptive

1.4

8.9

<  0.001

2.2

2.1

0.91

7.5

− 0.1

7.6

<  0.001

 General counseling

1.4

6.3

<  0.001

4.7

4.7

0.98

4.9

0.0

4.9

0.005

Participation in health promotion activities

 Education sessions at VHCs

2.9

18.9

<  0.001

2.4

6.9

0.54

16.0

4.5

11.5

<  0.001

 Health activities in communities

0.8

8.7

<  0.001

0.4

0.2

<  0.001

7.9

− 0.2

8.1

<  0.001

Source of reproductive health information

 Counseling by VHC staff

5.5

14.2

<  0.001

3.1

6.2

0.02

8.7

3.1

5.6

0.012

 Counseling by private doctor/clinic

42.0

35.6

0.04

43.0

34.5

0.01

− 6.4

− 8.5

2.1

0.639

 TV

65.9

52.0

<  0.001

68.2

53.9

<  0.001

− 13.9

− 14.3

0.4

0.963

  1. DID difference-in-differences, VHCs village health centers, FP family planning
  2. aCounterfactual assumption