Skip to main content

Table 2 Sociodemographic characteristics of undergraduate students who participated in cognitive interviews and comparison with university’s undergraduate student body

From: College students’ interpretations of food security questions: results from cognitive interviews

Characteristic

All Participants a (n = 33)

Undergraduate Student Body a,b,c (n = 33,624)

Age (years), mean ± SD

19.5 ± 1.2

20.5 ± NR

College Classification, % (n)

 Freshman

30.3% (10)

20.3% (6837)

 Sophomore

27.3% (9)

22.9% (7701)

 Junior

27.3% (9)

24.7% (8287)

 Senior

15.2% (5)

29.9% (10051)

Race/Ethnicity, % (n)

 White

57.6% (19)

44.8% (15061)

 Black/African American

9.1% (3)

5.9% (1973)

 Hispanic or Latino/a

9.1% (3)

11.2% (3748)

 Asian/Pacific Islander

21.2% (7)

18.0% (6053)

 Other/Mixed

3.0% (1)

20.2% (6789)

Gender, % (n)

 Male

30.3% (10)

54.6% (18345)

 Female

69.7% (23)

45.4% (15267)

Has Dining Meal Plan, % (n)

51.5% (17)

NR

Residence Type, % (n)

 

NR

 Greek (Fraternity or Sorority) housing

6.1% (2)

 

 Co-operative or communal housing

3.0% (1)

 

 Campus residence hall

48.5% (16)

 

 Off-campus apartment or house

42.4% (14)

 

Living Situation, % (n)

 

NR

 Lives alone

6.1% (2)

 

 Lives with other(s)

93.9% (31)

 

Birth Country, % (n)

  

 United States

90.9% (30)

83.4% (28028)

 Other country

9.1% (3)

16.6% (5569)

First-Generation Student, % (n)

24.2% (8)

20.0% (NR)

Sources of Financial Support, % (n) d

 

NR

 Family

78.8% (26)

 

 Employment

54.6% (18)

 

 Government

48.5% (16)

 

 Scholarship

54.6% (18)

 

 Loans

48.5% (16)

 

 Other

3.0% (1)

 

Estimated Parental Income, % (n)

 

NR

 Under $15,000

3.0% (1)

 

 $15,000 to $34,999

9.1% (3)

 

 $35,000 to $54,999

9.1% (3)

 

 $55,000 to $74,999

15.2% (5)

 

 $75,000 to $99,999

21.2% (7)

 

 $100,000 to $149,999

12.1% (4)

 

 $150,000 or more

18.2% (6)

 

 Don’t Know

12.1% (4)

 

Perceived Familial Social Class, % (n)

 

NR

 Lower class

9.1% (3)

 

 Middle class

78.8% (26)

 

 Upper class

12.1% (4)

 

Familial NSLP use, % (n)

27.3% (9)

NR

Familial SNAP use, % (n)

3.0% (1)

NR

  1. NR Not Reported, NSLP National School Lunch Program, SNAP Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; a Sum of column may not add to 100% due to rounding; b Division of Management Information publicly available student enrolment data; c Missing data from Division of Management Information: college classification (n = 748), gender identity (n = 12), and birth country (n = 27); d Sum of column will be greater than 100% as participants could select more than one source