Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparation of mean scores and changes of the acceptance of the Woman’s Condom by demographic characteristics

From: Short-term acceptability of the Woman’s Condom and influencing factors among internal migrants in China

Variables

N (%)

The acceptability of the Woman’s Condom

First-use

mean (SD)

p value*

Fourth-use

mean (SD)

p value*

Changea

p value*

Between-individuals effects

 Age (Mean ± Standard Deviation)

34.79 ± 6.59

57.31 ± 14.19

0.79

58.35 ± 15.22

0.26

1.09 ± 8.18

0.04

 Gender

Male

900 (50.00)

58.06 ± 13.97

0.02

59.30 ± 15.05

0.01

1.25 ± 8.40

0.37

Female

900 (50.00)

56.57 ± 14.38

 

57.41 ± 15.34

 

0.94 ± 7.96

 

 Ethnicity

Han Chinese

1754 (97.66)

57.35 ± 14.21

0.35

58.39 ± 15.24

0.44

1.07 ± 8.20

0.60

Others

42 (2.34)

55.63 ± 13.32

 

56.76 ± 14.42

 

2.03 ± 7.47

 

 Education

Junior or below

94 (5.25)

58.53 ± 13.21

0.26

58.35 ± 15.89

0.25

0.35 ± 10.18

0.71

High school

284 (15.85)

57.78 ± 15.47

 

58.93 ± 16.09

 

1.37 ± 7.80

 

Three-year college

554 (30.91)

56.77 ± 13.68

 

57.50 ± 15.24

 

0.76 ± 8.24

 

Bachelor degree or above

860 (47.99)

57.37 ± 14.23

 

58.71 ± 14.88

 

1.31 ± 8.03

 

 Occupation

Unemployed or self-employed

312 (17.33)

56.39 ± 13.74

0.83

56.28 ± 15.27

0.01

0.01 ± 10.52

0.01

Workers/salespeople

378 (21.01)

58.20 ± 15.33

 

59.25 ± 16.67

 

1.09 ± 7.65

 

Education, health and civil staff

915 (50.83)

57.48 ± 13.96

 

58.55 ± 14.64

 

1.03 ± 7.43

 

Others

195 (10.83)

56.19 ± 13.58

 

58.94 ± 14.70

 

3.15 ± 7.97

 

 Adverse effects

Yes

32 (1.78)

57.49 ± 14.11

0.01

58.47 ± 15.13

0.11

1.06 ± 8.15

0.17

No

1768 (98.22)

46.83 ± 15.07

 

50.50 ± 18.96

 

3.35 ± 9.85

 

Between-groups effects

 Residence

Beijing

600 (33.33)

57.03 ± 13.87

0.01

59.39 ± 13.96

0.01

2.66 ± 7.92

0.01

Chongqing

600 (33.33)

54.33 ± 13.74

 

53.36 ± 15.34

 

−0.92 ± 9.12

 

Shanghai

600 (33.34)

60.62 ± 14.27

 

62.39 ± 14.91

 

1.65 ± 6.88

 

 Number of children

0

396 (22.32)

58.56 ± 15.54

0.36

59.58 ± 15.99

0.83

1.10 ± 8.88

0.54

1

1280 (72.15)

57.10 ± 13.97

 

58.08 ± 15.10

 

0.99 ± 7.88

 

> = 2

98 (5.52)

55.24 ± 11.20

 

57.29 ± 13.58

 

2.53 ± 9.12

 

 Time being together

Less than 1 year

188 (10.48)

59.83 ± 15.11

0.07

59.96 ± 16.29

0.44

0.24 ± 10.55

0.73

1–3 years

316 (17.61)

57.83 ± 15.80

 

59.03 ± 16.63

 

1.18 ± 8.21

 

Longer than 3 year

1290 (71.91)

56.79 ± 13.59

 

57.93 ± 14.67

 

1.20 ± 7.77

 

 Marital status

Married and live together

1672 (93.30)

57.30 ± 14.11

0.01

58.37 ± 15.07

0.06

1.13 ± 8.18

0.28

Married but do not live together

38 (2.12)

58.82 ± 14.12

 

59.32 ± 18.56

 

0.14 ± 10.47

 

Unmarried and do not live together

38 (2.12)

61.11 ± 16.50

 

61.77 ± 16.13

 

0.66 ± 6.84

 

Unmarried but live together

44 (2.46)

50.35 ± 12.41

 

51.34 ± 15.41

 

0.78 ± 7.84

 

 Contraception in the last month

No use

36 (2.00)

49.64 ± 19.92

0.01

51.69 ± 21.52

0.01

1.97 ± 10.95

0.11

Intrauterine device

258 (14.33)

57.55 ± 14.33

 

59.16 ± 15.81

 

1.62 ± 6.77

 

Oral contraceptive

444 (24.67)

59.95 ± 12.71

 

61.33 ± 13.58

 

1.31 ± 7.07

 

Male Condom

972 (54.00)

56.42 ± 14.23

 

56.95 ± 15.35

 

0.66 ± 8.95

 

Others

90 (5.00)

56.07 ± 15.72

 

59.08 ± 14.19

 

2.91 ± 6.58

 
  1. Abbreviations: N (%) Number of subjects/Percentages, SD Standard deviation
  2. *The P values were by t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Wilcoxon test or Kruskal-Wallis where appropriate
  3. aThe changes between the first-use and the fourth-use were calculated by the scores of fourth-use minus the scores of first-use