Table 4 Bivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between net usage and possible explanatory factors
Factor | Category | Number of participants (n) | Used ITN (n%) | OR(95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of house occupants | < 5 | 167 | 101 (60.5) | 1 |  |
5–9 | 272 | 214 (78.7) | 2.41 (1.57–3.69) | 0.001 | |
≥10 | 64 | 53 (82.8) | 3.15 (1.53–6.47) | 0.002 | |
Level of education | At least Higher | 58 | 17 (29.3) | 1 | Â |
Secondary | 151 | 42 (27.8) | 1.070 (0.55–2.10) | 0.830 | |
At most Primary | 295 | 76 (56.3) | 1.11 (0.64–2.23) | 0.575 | |
Nature of house | Wooden | 195 | 177 (90.8) | 1 | 1 |
Cement block | 308 | 234 (76.2) | .49 (0.25–.89) | 0.018 | |
Nature of nlet | Torn | 275 | 241 (87.6) | 2.11 (1.16–3.83) | 0.014 |
Good | 96 | 74 (77.1) | 1 | Â | |
Altitude | Low | 188 | 61 (32.4) | 0.607 (0.44–0.85) | 0.003 |
Intermediate | 315 | 147 (46.7) | 1. | Â | |
Community status | Rural | 63() | 36 (57.1) | .923 (0.44–1.95) | 0.834 |
Urban | 304 | 213 (70.0) | 1.0 | Â | |
Gender | Male | 1331 | 891 (66.9) | 0.98 (0.73–1.32) | 0.885 |
Female | 1708 | 1134 (66.4) | 1 | Â | |
Age Group (Years) | < 5 | 662 | 289 (43.7) | 1.038 (0.72–1.50) | 0.841 |
5–9 | 626 | 254 (40.6) | 1.178 (0.81–1.71) | 0.393 | |
10–15 | 407 | 125 (30.8) | 1.805 (1.14–2.86 | 0.012 | |
> 15 | 1340 | 598 (44.6) | 1 | 1 |