Skip to main content

Table 2 The effect of high Zika knowledge compared to low on preventive actions among Americans traveling to Zika endemic countries (N = 460)

From: Zika knowledge and prevention practices among U.S. travelers: a large cross-sectional survey study

Adopted preventive action

Participant Zika Knowledge

Comparison of Zika Knowledge (high vs. low)

High Zika Knowledge

N (%)

Low Zika Knowledge

N (%)

ORa

95% CI

I. Effective preventive actions

 Vector-related prevention

  Window and door screens

58 (25.6)

19 (8.2)

3.87*

(2.26–6.89)

  Other: Avoid Zika areas

3 (1.3)

1 (0.4)

3.11

(0.39–63.07)

  Remove standing water

68 (30.0)

31 (13.3)

2.79*

(1.75–4.52)

  Mosquito repellant

107 (47.1)

58 (24.9)

2.69*

(1.82–4.01)

  Covering clothes

78 (34.4)

40 (17.2)

2.53*

(1.64–3.94)

  Spray/fumigate

35 (15.4)

18 (7.7)

2.18*

(1.21–4.05)

  Mosquito coils/fire

55 (24.2)

35 (15.5)

1.75*

(1.10–2.81)

  Mosquito nets

39 (17.2)

34 (14.6)

1.21

(0.74–2.01)

 Sexual-related prevention

  Abstinence

17 (7.5)

3 (1.3)

6.21*

(2.05–26.85)

  Condoms

30 (13.2)

6 (2.6)

5.76*

(1.43–6.90)

II. Non-effective preventive actions

 Non-barrier contraception

9 (4.0)

4 (1.7)

2.36

(0.76–8.83)

  1. aOR indicates odds ratio from a bivariate logistic regression. The OR can be interpreted as the odds of engaging in the preventive action for high Zika knowledge participants compared to the odds of engaging in the preventive action for low Zika knowledge participants
  2. *Indicates significant finding at an a priori α value of 0.05