Skip to main content

Table 4 Longitudinal association between woman’s income and past year experience of sexual IPVa

From: Women’s income and risk of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania

 

Intervention arm (n = 313)

Control arm (n = 274)

Past year sexual IPV at follow-up n/N (%)

Age-adjusted OR (95%CI)

aORb (95%CI)

Past year sexual IPV at follow-up n/N (%)

Age-adjusted OR (95%CI)

aORb (95%CI)

Change in monthly income between baseline and follow-up

 Fallen 1+ quartile/stopped working

21/86 (24%)

12/77 (16%)

 Stayed in same quartile

16/96 (17%)

0.66 (0.32–1.37)

0.59 (0.27–1.26)

17/78 (22%)

1.57 (0.67–3.72)

1.17 (0.43–3.20)

 Increased 1+ quartile/started working

25/112 (22%)

0.95 (0.48–1.86)

1.01 (0.55–1.85)

17/99 (17%)

1.14 (0.46–2.80)

1.00 (0.36–2.80)

Change in financial contribution to household relative to husband between baseline and follow-up

 Was always lower/the same

42/195 (22%)

22/161 (14%)

 Was higher, now lower/same

6/33 (18%)

0.93 (0.34–2.53)

0.78 (0.31–1.99)

5/30 (17%)

1.72 (0.57–5.22)

1.44 (0.35–5.86)

 Was lower/same, now higher

8/45 (18%)

0.81 (0.31–2.07)

0.89 (0.27–2.97)

9/39 (23%)

2.48 (1.01–6.12)

3.21 (1.17–8.84)

 Always higher

10/40 (25%)

1.90 (0.89–4.05)

1.98 (0.66–5.97)

16/44 (36%)

6.11 (3.15–11.85)

6.59 (2.54–17.09)

  1. aAmong women married/living as married at baseline and follow-up
  2. bAdjusted for woman’s age, other income/financial contribution variable, partner’s age, baseline measure of outcome, woman’s education, partner’s education, relationship duration, and experience of household-level financial hardship in past year