BMC Public Health

Table 3 Comparison of Performance of Risk Screening Tools when Applied to the Local Setting

From: Choosing the most appropriate existing type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool for use in the Philippines: a case-control study with an urban Filipino population

Risk Assessment tool	Original Publication				Applied to the local setting
Risk Assessment tool	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive Predictive Value	Negative Predictive Value	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive Predictive Value	Negative Predictive Value
CANRISK [8]	0.70	0.67	0.35^a	0.90	0.86	0.54	0.20	0.92
FINDRISC [9]	0.78	0.67	0.13^b	0.99	0.94	0.45	0.20	0.95
ADA [7]	0.79	0.67	0.10^c	0.99	0.86	0.48	0.19	0.93
IDRS [10]	0.73	0.60	0.17^d	0.95	0.92	0.37	0.19	0.96
Indonesian [11]	–	–	–	–	0.89	0.34	0.18	0.96
Filipino [12]	–	–	–	–	0.68	0.73	0.27	0.92

Prevalence rate: ^a20.5%, ^b5.7%, ^c2.8%, ^d15.5%

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcpublichealth@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com