Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with condomless sex in the three-month follow-up period among Chinese MSM who participated in an online video intervention, 2015 (n = 791)

From: Driving force of condomless sex after online intervention among Chinese men who have sex with men

 

Condomless sex OR (95% CI)

Condomless sexa aOR (95% CI)

Gender Identity

 Gay

ref

ref

 Othersb

1.50 (1.09, 2.06)*

1.40 (1.00, 1.95)*

Student status

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

0.70 (0.53, 0.94)*

1.47 (0.95, 2.27)

Ever tested for HIV/Syphilis

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

1.23 (0.93, 1.64)

1.07 (0.79, 1.44)

HIV status

 Positive

ref

ref

 Negative

1.59 (0.71, 3.58)

1.64 (0.72, 3.75)

 Unknown

1.35 (0.60, 3.04)

1.56 (0.68, 3.57)

Sex under the influence of alcoholc

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

1.90 (1.22, 2.97)*

1.79 (1.13, 2.83)*

Group sexd

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

1.37 (0.85, 2.18)

1.22 (0.75, 2.00)

Ever had sex tourism

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

2.75 (1.34, 5.63)*

2.40 (1.14, 5.03)*

Receptive anal position with stable male partnerc

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

1.67 (1.25, 2.22)*

1.85 (1.37, 2.50)*

Receptive anal position with casual male partnerc

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

1.43 (1.08, 1.90)*

1.47 (1.09, 1.97)*

Viewed additional condom use promotion videosce

 No

ref

ref

 Yes

0.67 (0.50, 0.89)*

0.67 (0.50, 0.91)*

Community engagement in sexual health

 None/ Minimal

ref

ref

 Minimal

0.74 (0.52, 1.36)

0.66 (0.46, 0.94)*

 Substantial

0.54 (0.35, 0.82)*

0.49 (0.32, 0.75)*

  1. aAdjusted for age (3 missing values, continuous), education, income, marital status, and types of intervention videos. N = 788
  2. bIncluding bisexual, heterosexual, and unsure
  3. cin the last 3 months
  4. din the last 12 months
  5. ecollected at the 3-month follow up survey
  6. *p-value< 0.05