From: Driving force of condomless sex after online intervention among Chinese men who have sex with men
 | Condomless sex OR (95% CI) | Condomless sexa aOR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|
Gender Identity | ||
 Gay | ref | ref |
 Othersb | 1.50 (1.09, 2.06)* | 1.40 (1.00, 1.95)* |
Student status | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 0.70 (0.53, 0.94)* | 1.47 (0.95, 2.27) |
Ever tested for HIV/Syphilis | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 1.23 (0.93, 1.64) | 1.07 (0.79, 1.44) |
HIV status | ||
 Positive | ref | ref |
 Negative | 1.59 (0.71, 3.58) | 1.64 (0.72, 3.75) |
 Unknown | 1.35 (0.60, 3.04) | 1.56 (0.68, 3.57) |
Sex under the influence of alcoholc | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 1.90 (1.22, 2.97)* | 1.79 (1.13, 2.83)* |
Group sexd | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 1.37 (0.85, 2.18) | 1.22 (0.75, 2.00) |
Ever had sex tourism | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 2.75 (1.34, 5.63)* | 2.40 (1.14, 5.03)* |
Receptive anal position with stable male partnerc | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 1.67 (1.25, 2.22)* | 1.85 (1.37, 2.50)* |
Receptive anal position with casual male partnerc | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 1.43 (1.08, 1.90)* | 1.47 (1.09, 1.97)* |
Viewed additional condom use promotion videosce | ||
 No | ref | ref |
 Yes | 0.67 (0.50, 0.89)* | 0.67 (0.50, 0.91)* |
Community engagement in sexual health | ||
 None/ Minimal | ref | ref |
 Minimal | 0.74 (0.52, 1.36) | 0.66 (0.46, 0.94)* |
 Substantial | 0.54 (0.35, 0.82)* | 0.49 (0.32, 0.75)* |