Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Associations between SFA and hsCRP categories adjusting for different PA levels (Sedentary, Light, MVPA)

From: Dietary saturated fat and low-grade inflammation modified by accelerometer-measured physical activity in adolescence: results from the GINIplus and LISA birth cohorts

  hsCRP II vs I hsCRP III vs I
RRR 95%CI p-value p-int RRR 95%CI p-value p-int
Females
 SFAa 0.970 0.88;1.07 0.543   0.966 0.861;1.09 0.563  
 +Sedentaryb 0.970 0.88;1.07 0.543 <0.01 0.967 0.861;1.09 0.565 <0.01
 +Lightc 0.969 0.88;1.07 0.538 0.007 0.965 0.859;1.08 0.546 <0.01
 +MVPAd 0.970 0.88;1.07 0.546 0.519 0.968 0.862;1.09 0.577 0.658
Males
 SFAa 0.873 0.78;0.98 0.021   0.922 0.81;1.06 0.241  
 +Sedentaryb 0.879 0.78;0.99 0.027 <0.01 0.927 0.81;1.06 0.273 0.753
 +Lightc 0.873 0.78;0.98 0.021 0.026 0.922 0.81;1.06 0.241 0.627
 +MVPAd 0.881 0.78;0.99 0.034 0.615 0.927 0.81;1.06 0.280 0.413
  1. aModels adjusted for study, region, parental education, pubertal stage, fasted blood sampling, exact age at blood sampling, BMI, total daily energy intake; b SFA model further adjusted for Sedentary PA; c SFA model further adjusted for Light PA; d SFA model further adjusted for MVPA. Significant associations are marked in bold (p-value <0.05). p-int = p-value for interaction term between SFA and each PA variable, indicated as significant (bold) when <0.05