Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between SFA and hsCRP categories adjusting for different PA levels (Sedentary, Light, MVPA)

From: Dietary saturated fat and low-grade inflammation modified by accelerometer-measured physical activity in adolescence: results from the GINIplus and LISA birth cohorts

 

hsCRP II vs I

hsCRP III vs I

RRR

95%CI

p-value

p-int

RRR

95%CI

p-value

p-int

Females

 SFAa

0.970

0.88;1.07

0.543

 

0.966

0.861;1.09

0.563

 

 +Sedentaryb

0.970

0.88;1.07

0.543

<0.01

0.967

0.861;1.09

0.565

<0.01

 +Lightc

0.969

0.88;1.07

0.538

0.007

0.965

0.859;1.08

0.546

<0.01

 +MVPAd

0.970

0.88;1.07

0.546

0.519

0.968

0.862;1.09

0.577

0.658

Males

 SFAa

0.873

0.78;0.98

0.021

 

0.922

0.81;1.06

0.241

 

 +Sedentaryb

0.879

0.78;0.99

0.027

<0.01

0.927

0.81;1.06

0.273

0.753

 +Lightc

0.873

0.78;0.98

0.021

0.026

0.922

0.81;1.06

0.241

0.627

 +MVPAd

0.881

0.78;0.99

0.034

0.615

0.927

0.81;1.06

0.280

0.413

  1. aModels adjusted for study, region, parental education, pubertal stage, fasted blood sampling, exact age at blood sampling, BMI, total daily energy intake; b SFA model further adjusted for Sedentary PA; c SFA model further adjusted for Light PA; d SFA model further adjusted for MVPA. Significant associations are marked in bold (p-value <0.05). p-int = p-value for interaction term between SFA and each PA variable, indicated as significant (bold) when <0.05
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us