Peer Review reports
From: Use of Twitter data to improve Zika virus surveillance in the United States during the 2016 epidemic
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ashlynn Daughton |
| 22 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Feng Wang |
| 27 Dec 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Shahir Masri |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 Dec 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Mar 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ashlynn Daughton |
| 3 Apr 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Feng Wang |
| 7 May 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Shahir Masri |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 May 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 May 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Shahir Masri |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 May 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 31 May 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Shahir Masri |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 31 May 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Jun 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Jun 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12889-019-7103-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.