Rates (1) | Rates (2) | Rates (3) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario A | Scenario B | Scenario C | Scenario D | Scenario E | Scenario F | ||||||||
Rates (1) | EL Distrib (1) | Rates (1) | EL Distrib (2) | Rates (2) | EL Distrib (1) | Rates (2) | EL Distrib (2) | Rates (3) | EL Distrib (1) | Rates (3) | EL Distrib (2) | ||
EL specific rates and share | EL1 | 750 | 40% | 750 | 20% | 630 | 40% | 630 | 20% | 750 | 40% | 750 | 20% |
EL2 | 550 | 25% | 550 | 25% | 500 | 25% | 500 | 25% | 570 | 25% | 570 | 25% | |
EL3 | 450 | 25% | 450 | 25% | 400 | 25% | 400 | 25% | 420 | 25% | 420 | 25% | |
EL4 | 300 | 10% | 300 | 30% | 290 | 10% | 290 | 30% | 260 | 10% | 260 | 30% | |
Pairwise inequality indices | Absol. Rates Diff | Change from A | Change from A | Change from A | Change from A | Change from A | |||||||
EL1 vs EL4 | 450 | 450 | no change | 340 | − 110 | 340 | −110 | 490 | 40 | 490 | 40 | ||
EL2 vs EL4 | 250 | 250 | no change | 210 | −40 | 210 | −40 | 310 | 60 | 310 | 60 | ||
EL3 vs EL4 | 150 | 150 | no change | 110 | −40 | 110 | −40 | 160 | 10 | 160 | 10 | ||
Rate ratios | |||||||||||||
EL1 vs EL4 | 2.50 | 2.50 | no change | 2.17 | −13% | 2.17 | −13% | 2.88 | 15% | 2.88 | 15% | ||
EL2 vs EL4 | 1.83 | 1.83 | no change | 1.72 | −6% | 1.72 | −6% | 2.19 | 20% | 2.19 | 20% | ||
EL3 vs EL4 | 1.50 | 1.50 | no change | 1.38 | −8% | 1.38 | −8% | 1.62 | 8% | 1.62 | 8% | ||
Change from A due to EL shift † | Change from A due to change in mortality differentials | Change from A due to EL shift † | Change from A due to change in mortality differentials | Change from A due to EL shift † | |||||||||
Total Change from A¥ | Total Change from A¥ | ||||||||||||
Composite inequality indices | RII | 2.86 | 3.75 | 31%† | 2.40 | −16% | 3.03 | 22% † 6% ¥ | 3.37 | 18% | 4.96 | 56%† 73% ¥ | |
SII | − 559 | − 567 | 1%† | − 424 | −24% | − 441 | 3% † − 21% ¥ | − 612 | 9% | − 619 | 1% † 11% ¥ | ||
PAF | 0.48 | 0.39 | −19%† | 0.43 | −10% | 0.34 | −19%† − 29% ¥ | 0.54 | 13% | 0.44 | −21%† −8% ¥ |