Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline sociodemographic, sexual health attitudes and practices, and sexual behavior characteristics between youth (16–29) and adult (≥30) GBM in Vancouver, BC (n = 698)

From: HIV leadership programming attendance is associated with PrEP and PEP awareness among young, gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Vancouver, Canada

 

Younger

(n = 257)

N (%)

Older

(n = 441)

N (%)

P-value

Demographics

 Gender Identity

  

< 0.001

  Male

244 (94.9)

438 (99.3)

 

  Transman/Intersex

13 (5.1)

3 (0.7)

 

 Sexual Orientation

  

0.001

  Gay

216 (84.1)

384 (87.1)

 

  Bisexual

14 (5.5)

40 (9.1)

 

  Other

27 (10.5)

17 (3.9)

 

 Ethnicity

  

0.098

  White

197 (76.7)

330 (74.8)

 

  Indigenous

30 (11.7)

39 (8.8)

 

  Asian

8 (3.1)

32 (7.3)

 

  Other

22 (8.6)

40 (9.1)

 

 HIV Status

  

< 0.001

  Negative

246 (95.7)

251 (56.9)

 

  Positive

11 (4.3)

190 (43.1)

 

 Formal Education

  

0.592

  Did not complete high school

17 (6.6)

34 (7.7)

 

  Completed high school

240 (93.4)

407 (92.3)

 

 Annual Income

  

< 0.001

  < $30,000

185 (72.0)

242 (54.9)

 

  $30,000–$59,999

61 (23.7)

126 (28.6)

 

  $60,000 or more

11 (4.3)

73 (16.6)

 

 Relationship Status

  

0.038

  Single

169 (65.8)

255 (57.8)

 

  Partnered

88 (34.2)

186 (42.2)

 

Behavior

 Number of Male Sex Partners, P6M: median, Q1-Q3

5 (3–11)

5 (2–19)

0.340

 Sexual Risk, P6M

  

0.002

  No anal sex

27 (10.7)

55 (12.8)

 

  Only condom-protected anal intercourse

69 (27.3)

78 (18.1)

 

  Any condomless anal sex, but only seroconcordant

76 (30.0)

106 (24.7)

 

  Any serodiscordant condomless anal sex

81 (32.0)

191 (44.4)

 

 Any Escort/Sex Work

  

< 0.001

  No

223 (86.8)

350 (79.4)

 

  Yes, in P6M

20 (7.8)

24 (5.4)

 

  Yes, but not in P6M

14 (5.5)

67 (15.2)

 

 Prevention Practice, P6M: Consistent Condom Use

  

< 0.001

  No

83 (32.4)

239 (54.4)

 

  Yes

173 (67.6)

200 (45.6)

 

 Prevention Practice, P6M: Seropositioning

  

< 0.001

  No

203 (79.3)

288 (65.6)

 

  Yes

53 (20.7)

151 (34.4)

 

 Prevention Practice, P6M: Serosorting

  

0.384

  No

155 (60.5)

251 (57.2)

 

  Yes

101 (39.5)

188 (42.8)

 

Prevention Practice, P6M: Viral Load Sorting

  

< 0.001

  No

237 (92.6)

326 (74.3)

 

  Yes

19 (7.4)

113 (25.7)

 

Prevention Practice, P6M: Ask Partner Their HIV Status

  

0.015

  No

89 (34.8)

194 (44.2)

 

  Yes

167 (65.2)

245 (55.8)

 

Awareness and Attitudes

 Heard of TasP

  

0.009

  No

139 (54.1)

193 (43.9)

 

  Yes

118 (45.9)

247 (56.1)

 

 Heard of PrEP

  

< 0.001

  No

178 (85.6)

243 (70.6)

 

  Yes

30 (14.4)

101 (29.4)

 

 Heard of nPEP

  

0.078

  No

100 (48.1)

139 (40.4)

 

  Yes

108 (51.9)

205 (59.6)

 

 HIV Treatment Optimism Scale Score

  

< 0.001

  median, Q1-Q3

24 (21–27)

26 (21–30)

 

Health Care

 Any STI Testing, P6M

  

0.205

  No

98 (43.0)

149 (37.8)

 

  Yes

130 (57.0)

245 (62.2)

 

 Any STI Diagnosis, P6M

  

0.774

  No

221 (88.0)

364 (88.8)

 

  Yes

30 (12.0)

46 (11.2)

 

 Have a General Practitioner (GP)

  

< 0.001

  No

138 (54.3)

82 (18.8)

 

  Yes

116 (45.7)

355 (81.2)

 

 Told GP about sexual orientation “out”a

  

< 0.001

  No

38 (32.8)

31 (8.7)

 

  Yes

78 (67.2)

324 (91.3)

 
  1. P6M past 6 months, TasP treatment as prevention, PreP Pre-exposure Prophylatic, nPEP Post-exposure prophylactic, STI Sexually Transmitted Infection, HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus, GP General Practioner
  2. aOnly asked to those that reported having a GP