Skip to main content

Table 4 Linear regression on perceived restorative capacity of the running environment (N = 2477)

From: Attractive running environments for all? A cross-sectional study on physical environmental characteristics and runners’ motives and attitudes, in relation to the experience of the running environment

 

Model 1 (confounders, motives and attitudes, perceived environmental characteristics)

Model 2 (model 1 + perceived environmental – years of running experience interactions)

 

St. Beta (p)

SE

St. Beta (p)

SE

Constanta

0.258

0.237

− 0.139

0.696

Confounders

 Age (ref = ≥ 46 year)

 ≤ 35 year

− 0.01

0.03

−0.008

0.03

 36–45 year

−0.031*

0.027

−0.031*

0.027

Male (female = ref)

−0.002

0.024

−0.002

0.024

Education (higher = ref)

 Lower or middle

0.014

0.024

0.014

0.024

Years of running experience (> 5 y = ref)

 < 1 y

0.015

0.037

0.112

0.275

 1–5 y

0.01

0.025

−0.023

0.166

Distance monitoring y/n (ref = no)

0.011

0.026

0.009

0.026

Watch use (ref = no)

0.025

0.037

0.029

0.037

App use (ref = no)

0.047*

0.042

0.049*

0.042

Organizational context (athletics club = ref)

 Individual

−0.016

0.032

−0.013

0.032

 Friends, colleagues, small group

−0.008

0.034

−0.008

0.034

Intrapersonal characteristics: motivations and attitudes

 Bodily and mental advantages of running

0.041*

0.029

0.041*

0.029

 Identification with running

0.017

0.025

0.015

0.025

 Practical advantages of running

0.015

0.025

0.018

0.025

 Individual motives for quitting

−0.022

0.017

−0.02

0.017

 Social motives for quitting

0.008

0.018

0.007

0.018

Perceived environmental characteristics

 Hinderance by pedestrians

−0.025

0.019

−0.231

0.148

 Hinderance by cyclists/mopeds

0.008

0.014

0.148

0.112

 Hinderance by cars

−0.040**

0.013

0.304*

0.105

 Hinderance by unleashed dogs

0.012

0.011

−0.077

0.091

 Hinderance through remarks

−0.007

0.021

0.161

0.161

 Hinderance through threats

−0.015

0.023

−0.167

0.179

 Hinderance through poor lighting

0.016

0.009

0.023

0.073

 Comfortable surface

0.037**

0.012

−0.086

0.094

 Lively route

0.128***

0.013

0.127

0.097

 Green route

0.686***

0.013

0.808***

0.105

Interactions perceived environment characteristics * years of running experience (ref = > 5 y running experience)

 Pedestrians * < 1 y running experience

  

0.017

0.06

 Pedestrians * 1–5 y running experience

  

0.24**

0.041

 Cyclists/mopeds * < 1 y running experience

  

−0.044

0.045

 Cyclists/mopeds * 1–5 y running experience

  

−0.111

0.031

 Cars * < 1 y running experience

  

−0.205*

0.043

 Cars * 1–5 y running experience

  

−0.192**

0.029

 Unleashed dogs * < 1 y running experience

  

0.046

0.038

 Unleashed dogs * 1–5 y running experience

  

0.058

0.024

 Remarks * < 1 y running experience

  

−0.155

0.063

 Remarks * 1–5 y running experience

  

−0.031

0.047

 Threats * < 1 y running experience

  

0.136

0.072

 Threats * 1–5 y running experience

  

0.034

0.05

 Poor lighting * < 1 y running experience

  

−0.027

0.03

 Poor lighting * 1–5 y running experience

  

0.022

0.02

 Comfortable surface * < 1 y running experience

  

0.099

0.039

 Comfortable surface * 1–5 y running experience

  

0.071

0.025

 Lively route * < 1 y running experience

  

0.076

0.039

 Lively route * 1–5 y running experience

  

−0.1

0.027

 Green route * < 1 y running experience

  

−0.187

0.043

 Green route * 1–5 y running experience

  

0.04

0.029

Model fit

 Adjusted R2

0.599

0.602

 SE

0.5261

0.5244

  1. aConstant: Unstandardized Beta instead of Standardized Beta
  2. *Significance < 0.05; **Significance < 0.01; ***Significance < 0.001