Skip to main content

Table 7 Clinical performance of triaging hrHPV+ women with HPV16/18 genotyping and using LBC to triage OHR

From: Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies

Study

Sensitivity (CIN2+)

Specificity (CIN2+)

Relative cost of Comparator 2

ATHENA (Wright T et al., 2014 [27])

93.3%

62.8%

− 24%

ATHENA (Castle PE et al., 2011 [28])

51.8%

75.3%

− 24%

POBASCAM (Dijkstra M et al., 2013 [32])

90.3%

57.6%

−25%

PavDag (Stanczuk GA. et al., 2017 [33])

93.3%

52.7%

−24%