Skip to main content

Table 3 Hazard ratios for Improved Functional Ability Among Women According to Socioeconomic Status

From: Socioeconomic status and improvement in functional ability among older adults in Japan: a longitudinal study

Socioeconomic Status

Disability Group at the Time of the Initial Assessment

Mild (n = 989)

Moderate (n = 816)

Severe (n = 407)

Crude

Modela

Crude

Modela

Crude

Modela

HR (95.0% CI)

HR (95.0% CI)

HR (95.0% CI)

HR (95.0% CI)

HR (95.0% CI)

HR (95.0% CI)

Education (years)

 ≤9

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 10–12

0.98 (0.64–1.52)

1.03 (0.65–1.63)

0.95 (0.68–1.34)

0.98 (0.68–1.41)

1.16 (0.74–1.83)

1.32 (0.81–2.18)

 13+

0.67 (0.31–1.45)

0.63 (0.28–1.41)

1.10 (0.67–1.81)

1.24 (0.74–2.10)

1.39 (0.73–2.62)

2.16 (1.03–4.53)*

Income (quartiles)

 Q1 (lowest)

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 Q2

1.14 (0.62–2.08)

1.20 (0.65–2.24)

0.72 (0.45–1.14)

0.78 (0.48–1.29)

1.89 (0.97–3.66)+

2.12 (1.04–4.34)*

 Q3

0.87 (0.44–1.72)

0.89 (0.43–1.82)

0.96 (0.60–1.51)

1.09 (0.67–1.79)

1.08 (0.53–2.19)

0.94 (0.45–1.98)

 Q4 (highest)

1.21 (0.66–2.23)

1.21 (0.65–2.27)

0.83 (0.53–1.29)

0.92 (0.57–1.49)

1.85 (1.06–3.22)*

1.66 (0.92–3.00)+

Occupation

 Manual

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 Non-Manual

0.94 (0.57–1.55)

0.97 (0.57–1.67)

0.88 (0.62–1.27)

0.81 (0.54–1.20)

0.74 (0.46–1.18)

0.65 (0.38–1.12)

  1. **P < .01, *P < .05, +P < .10. aAdjusted for age, other socioeconomic status, marital status, living status, comorbidities, depressive symptoms, and municipality. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Q, quartile; Ref., referent category. Estimates for missing categories of SES indicators were not reported