Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline and 16-week differences in body fat between study groups and treatment effects

From: Effect of diet with or without exercise on abdominal fat in postmenopausal women – a randomised trial

Type of abdominal adipose tissue

Baseline mean

16 weeks mean

% Within group 16 weeks change

Within group 16 weeks change (95% CI)

P-valuea

Between group 16 weeks change intervention vs control (95% CI)

P-valueb

Between group 16 weeks change Exercise vs Diet (95% CI)

P-valuec

Total (TAAT, cm2)

 Control

461

466

1.1%

4.9 (−4.1 to 13.9)

0.282

    

 Diet

454

398

−12.3%

−55.8 (−63.8 to − 47.8)

< 0.001

−60.8 (− 74.3 to − 47.3)

< 0.001

  

 Exercise+diet

449

379

−15.7%

−70.4 (−78.5 to −62.2)

< 0.001

−75.4 (−88.8 to −61.9)

< 0.001

− 14.6 (−25.5 to −3.7)

0.009

Subcutaneous (SAAT,cm2)

 Control

311

315

1.2%

3.6 (−3.5 to 10.7)

0.308

    

 Diet

312

273

−12.5%

− 38.9 (−44.7 to − 33.0)

< 0.001

−42.4 (−52.6 to − 32.3)

< 0.001

  

 Exercise+diet

306

257

−16.0%

−49.1 (−55.4 to − 42.8)

< 0.001

−53.0 (−63.1 to − 42.9)

< 0.001

−10.6 (− 18.7 to − 2.4)

0.011

Intra-abdominal (IAAT,cm2)

 Control

150

152

1.6%

2.4 (−3.4 o 8.2)

0.406

    

 Diet

142

125

−12.0%

−17.0 (−20.9 to −13.0)

< 0.001

−20.1 (− 26.6 to −13.75)

< 0.001

  

 Exercise+diet

143

122

−14.6%

−20.9 (− 24.4 to −17.4)

< 0.001

−24.0 (−30.4 to − 17.6)

< 0.001

− 3.8 (−9.0 to 1.3)

0.145

  1. TAAT Total abdominal adipose tissue, SAAT Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue, IAAT Intra-abdominal adipose tissue a. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant for the within group change
  2. b. A P-value of < 0.025 was considered significant for the comparison of both intervention groups versus control. c. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant for the comparison exercise versus diet