Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand

BMC Public Health

Table 3 Estimates of the Impact of Warning Labels on Measures of Diet Quality for Beverage Purchases in the Pilot-DIET Study (N = 432)

Dependent Variable	Proportion of High-in Sugar Products (%)	Total Sugar Purchased (g)	Sugar purchased per dollar spent (g / $)	Total Dollar Spent ($)	Total expenditure on high-in-sugar products ($)
Dependent Variable	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]	Coefficient [Std. Error]
Constant	0.06	76.47	19.73	12.28	−3.79
Constant	[0.10]	[132.96]	[5.43]	[7.10]	[3.52]
Stop Sign Label	−0.06 *	54.97	−0.06	0.57	0.08
Stop Sign Label	[0.03]	[44.21]	[1.81]	[2.36]	[1.17]
Warning Label	−0.11 ***	− 0.48	−2.10	1.52	− 0.25
Warning Label	[0.03]	[44.22]	[1.81]	[2.36]	[1.17]
Age (years)	0.00 ***	3.06 *	−0.01	0.13	0.20 ***
Age (years)	[0.00]	[1.75]	[0.07]	[0.09]	[0.05]
BMI (kg/m²)	0.00	4.62	−0.02	0.00	0.12
BMI (kg/m²)	[0.00]	[4.52]	[0.19]	[0.24]	[0.12]
Female	0.08 ***	−32.72	0.63	−4.16 **	1.07
Female	[0.03]	[38.29]	[1.56]	[2.05]	[1.01]
Chinese	0.04	33.14	−2.25	5.12 *	1.38
Chinese	[0.04]	[54.40]	[2.22]	[2.91]	[1.44]
Primary grocery Purchaser	−0.04	−55.38	−1.09	−0.75	−1.40
Primary grocery Purchaser	[0.03]	[41.79]	[1.71]	[2.23]	[1.11]
Has Children	−0.02	−32.57	−0.29	−1.36	− 1.19
Has Children	[0.03]	[41.24]	[1.68]	[2.20]	[1.09]

ISSN: 1471-2458