Skip to main content

Table 4 Effects of exposure to parental smoking and intention to smoke in childhood on the relationship of SEP across the early life course and mid-adulthood (CDAH-2, 2009–11) smoking in the best-fitting life course models, Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study, Australia*

From: Socioeconomic position over the life course from childhood and smoking status in mid-adulthood: results from a 25-year follow-up study

Best-fitting life course models

Model 1 (adjusted for age + sex)

Model 2 (Model 1 + exposure to parental smoking)

Model 3 (Model 1 + intention to smoke in the following year)

RR (95% CI)

RR (95% CI)

Excess risk explained†, %

RR (95% CI)

Excess risk explained†, %

Sensitive period model

 Former smokers at CDAH-2§

  Manual, baseline

0.79 (0.63, 0.98)

0.78 (0.63, 0.98)

−2.6

0.76 (0.60, 0.95)

−14.6

  Manual, CDAH-1

1.25 (0.93, 1.68)

1.24 (0.93, 1.67)

3.0

1.20 (0.89, 1.60)

22.1

  Manual, CDAH-2

1.00 (0.73, 1.37)

0.99 (0.72, 1.35)

> 100‡

0.97 (0.71, 1.33)

> 100‡

Current smokers at CDAH-2§

 Manual, baseline

1.32 (1.00, 1.73)

1.21 (0.93, 1.58)

33.0

1.19 (0.89, 1.59)

40.2

 Manual, CDAH-1

1.42 (0.95, 2.11)

1.43 (0.98, 2.10)

−3.4

1.24 (0.83, 1.86)

42.3

 Manual, CDAH-2

1.55 (1.04, 2.30)

1.42 (0.97, 2.09)

23.0

1.50 (1.01, 2.25)

7.8

Accumulation model, No. of times manual

 Former smokers at CDAH-2§

1.01 (0.91, 1.12)

1.00 (0.90, 1.11)

> 100‡

0.97 (0.87, 1.07)

> 100‡

 Current smokers at CDAH-2§

1.43 (1.27, 1.61)

1.36 (1.21, 1.53)

16.0

1.32 (1.17, 1.48)

20.6

  1. RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval; CDAH: childhood determinants of adult health
  2. * About 20% participants missed childhood potential mediators’ data. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to deal with the missing data, with 20 imputations
  3. † The percent excess risk explained = (RRu – RRa)/(RRu – 1) * 100. RRu was the average RR in Model 1. RRa was the average RR in Model 2 or 3
  4. ‡ Estimation of excess risk as a percentage of Model 1 RR is unreasonable when the RR in Model 1 was extremely close to 1
  5. § Non-smokers were the excluded category for the outcome
  6. Bold RRs (95% CIs) indicate statistically significant results in the best-fitting life course models