Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Mean respondents’ quality of life scores, before and after CATS intervention

From: Effectiveness of community adolescent treatment supporters (CATS) interventions in improving linkage and retention in care, adherence to ART and psychosocial well-being: a randomised trial among adolescents living with HIV in rural Zimbabwe

Research Arm Baseline (mean point count) Count (N) End line (mean point count) Count (N) Difference (95% CI) P value
Intervention 3.16 47 3.450 47 0.29 (0.031,0.549) 0.028
Control 3.61 39 3.35 28 0.26 (0.61,0.459) 0.011
  1. Mean respondents’ quality of life scores, before and after CATS intervention is given for both the intervention and control arm, and both at baseline and endline. N = 47 for the intervention arm at baseline, N = 39 for the control arm at baseline, N = 47 for the intervention arm at end line, and N = 28 for the control arm at endline. Difference between the baseline and endline is provided (including the 95% CI). Difference between baseline and endline is statistically significant if p < 0.05. The bold text under p-value column show statistical significance