Skip to main content

Table 3 Principals’ views and knowledge of food and beverage marketing overall and by school type

From: Food and beverage marketing in primary and secondary schools in Canada

 

Agree n (%)

Neutral n (%)

Disagree n (%)

p-Value

Overall

Primary

Secondary

Overall

Primary

Secondary

Overall

Primary

Secondary

 

VIEWS

 I have concerns about the educational value of some teaching materials produced by food and beverage companies/industry associations

93 (64)

67 (64)

26 (63)

45 (31)

32 (31)

12 (29)

8 (5)

5 (5)

3 (7)

0.834

 Schools should be an environment that is free from the commercial pressures children face nowadays

116 (79)

84 (81)

31 (76)

23 (16)

16 (15)

7 (17)

7 (5)

4 (4)

3 (7)

0.642

 Exposing students to food/beverage marketing in schools is an acceptable trade-off for funds or resources that may otherwise not be available

27 (18)

19 (18)

7 (17)

40 (27)

26 (25)

14 (34)

79 (54)

59 (57)

20 (49)

0.534

 Schools should not be seen to promote a particular food/beverage brand or company

113 (77)

86 (83)

27 (66)

23 (16)

13 (13)

10 (24)

10 (7)

5 (5)

4 (10)

0.088

 It is perfectly acceptable to occasionally give students free samples of branded food or beverage products, regardless of nutritional profile

20 (14)

9 (9)a

11 (28)a

21 (14)

13 (13)

7 (18)

104 (72)

82 (79)b

22 (55)b

0.006

 It is only fair that food and beverage companies/industry associations gain some commercial benefit from providing schools with funds or other resources

24 (16)

11 (11)a

12 (29)a

40 (27)

30 (29)

10 (24)

82 (56)

63 (61)

19 (46)

0.021

 As long as the school benefits, it does not matter if a food/beverage company or industry association has a commercial motive for providing money or other resources

10 (7)

4 (4)

5 (12)

14 (10)

8 (8)

6 (15)

121 (83)

91 (88)

30 (73)

0.065

 Encouraging students to collect token from items with a high fat, salt or sugar content undermines teaching about healthy eating

119 (82)

83 (81)

35 (85)

13 (9)

9 (9)

4 (10)

13 (9)

11 (11)

2 (5)

0.546

 To expose a captive audience of school children to commercial food/beverage messages is exploitative/raises ethical concerns

118 (82)

87 (85)

31 (76)

17 (12)

7 (7)a

9 (22)a

9 (6)

8 (8)

1 (2)

0.022

 Most teachers in our school evaluate classroom materials for bias or promotional content

117 (81)

80 (78)

36 (89)

17 (12)

15 (15)

2 (5)

11 (8)

8 (8)

3 (7)

0.258

KNOWLEDGE

 Schemes that involves collecting tokens/vouchers unfairly influence students to buy certain items when given the opportunity, either at school or in the community

119 (83)

84 (82)

34 (83)

12 (8)

7 (7)

5 (12)

13 (9)

11 (11)

2 (5)

0.347

 Schools involvement with some food/beverage companies/industry associations may have an undesirable effect on the food choices that students make

118 (81)

86 (84)

32 (78)

16 (11)

9 (9)

6 (15)

11 (8)

8 (8)

3 (7)

0.579

 Food and beverage marketing is thought to be associated with childhood obesity

110 (76)

79 (77)

31 (76)

23 (16)

17 (17)

6 (15)

11 (8)

6 (6)

4 (10)

0.699

  1. Differences in Principals’ views and knowledge of food and beverage marketing were compared between primary and secondary schools using the chi-square test (p < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance). Post hoc testing (z-test) with a Bonferroni correction was carried out when appropriate. Matching superscripts within rows denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Chi-square test result is unreliable as one or more cells have an expected value lower than 5