Skip to main content

Table 1 Relationship between Demographic Variables and AUDIT Score Categories and Self-Reported Illicit Drug Use

From: Prevalence and predictors of alcohol and drug use among secondary school students in Botswana: a cross-sectional study

 

All study participants

N = 1936

  

Alcohol Use

N = 1927

   

Drug Use

N = 1885

  
  

Hazardous Drinking

N = 434

(22.4%)

Lower-risk Drinking

N = 382

(19.7%)

Non-drinkers

N = 1111

(57.4%)

Missing

N = 9

(0.5%)

p-value*

Yes

N = 324

(16.7%)

No

N = 1561

(80.6%)

Missing

N = 51

(2.6%)

p-value

 

Median (IQR) or Number

Median (IQR) or N (%)

Median (IQR) or N (%)

Median (IQR) or N (%)

Median (IQR) or N (%)

 

Median (IQR) or N (%)

Median (IQR) or N (%)

Median (IQR) or N (%)

 

Demographics**

Age, N = 1935

16 (14–17) (mean 15.6)

16 (15–17) (mean 16.1)

15 (14–17) (mean 15.5)

16 (14–17) (mean 15.5)

15 (14–17) (mean 14.9)

0.003

16 (15–17) (mean 16.1)

16 (14–17) (mean 15.5)

15 (14–16) (mean 15.4)

< 0.001

Gender

     

0.003

    

 Male

904 (46.7%)

256 (28.3%)

180 (19.9%)

464 (51.3%)

4 (0.4%)

 

212 (23.5%)

671 (74.2%)

21 (2.3%)

< 0.001

 Female

1029 (53.2%)

175 (17.0%)

202 (19.6%)

647 (62.9%)

5 (0.5%)

 

110 (10.7%)

889 (86.4%)

30 (2.9%)

 

 Missing

3 (0%)

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 

2 (0.6%)

1 (0.1%)

0 (0%)

 

Form in school (range 1–5)

3 (2–4) (mean 2.9)

3 (2–4) (mean 3.2)

3 (2–4) (mean 2.8)

3 (2–4) (mean 2.8)

2 (1–2) (mean 1.8)

0.005

4 (2–4) (mean 3.3)

3 (2–4) (mean 2.9)

2 (2–3) (mean 2.5)

< 0.001

 Form 1

402 (20.8%)

63 (15.7%)

78 (19.4%)

257 (63.9%)

4 (1.0%)

 

43 (10.7%)

350 (87.1%)

9 (2.2%)

 

 Form 2

371 (19.2%)

68 (18.3%)

82 (22.1%)

218 (58.8%)

3 (0.8%)

 

44 (11.9%)

304 (81.9%)

23 (6.2%)

 

 Form 3

360 (18.6%)

87 (24.2%)

87 (24.2%)

185 (51.4%)

1 (0.2%)

 

64 (17.8%).

289 (80.3%)

7 (1.9%)

 

 Form 4

566 (29.2%)

131 (23.1%)

96 (17.0%)

338 (59.7%)

1 (0.2%)

 

107 (18.9%)

448 (79.2%)

11 (1.9%)

 

 Form 5

237 (12.2%)

85 (35.9%)

39 (16.4%)

113 (47.7%)

0 (0%)

 

66 (27.9%)

170 (71.7%)

1 (0.4%)

 

School locations

 Urban

1173 (60.6%)

290 (24.7%)

233 (19.9%)

641 (54.6%)

9 (0.8%)

0.028

212 (18.1%)

928 (79.1%)

33 (2.8%)

0.24

 Peri-urban

763 (39.4%)

144 (18.9%)

149 (19.5%)

470 (61.6%)

0 (0%)

 

112 (14.7%)

633 (83.0%)

18 (2.4%)

 
  1. Hazard drinking = AUDIT score “5+”, Low Risk Drinking is AUDIT scores “1,2,3,4”; Non-drinkers is AUDIT score “0” *Significance of differences between group analyzed using ordinal multinomial cumulative logit analysis using GEE methods to adjusted for clustering by school **Significance of differences between group analyzed using univariate binomial logit analysis using GEE methods to adjusted for clustering by school