From: HIV testing within general practices in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review
Author, year | Country | Study design | Study population | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Agusti, 2013 [50] | Spain | Cross-sectional questionnaire survey, 2012 | 1308 GPsa from the two largest Spanish scientific medical societies for family and community medicine | Barriers to provide (rapid) HIV testing: lack of time; lack of training; cultural barriers. |
Fraisse, 2015 [37] | France | Cross-sectional questionnaire survey, 2013 | 78 GPs working in a 150,000-population district in the south of France | Barriers to provide rapid HIV testing: time constraints. |
Gauthier, 2012 [51] | France | Prospective interventional study offering rapid testing in primary care, 2010 | 62 GPs and 383 primary care patients, covering six French regions + 72 GPs participating in the evaluation post intervention | Barriers to provide rapid HIV testing: difficulties to perform the test; lack of time; window period; difficulties to screen for other STIs. |
Gennotte, 2013 [52] | Belgium | Prospective interventional study offering rapid HIV testing in a Brussels area with a substantial African community, 2010–2011 | 10 GPs and 1087 consultation records, 217 primary care patients offered rapid HIV testing | Barriers to provide (rapid) HIV testing: lack of time; difficulties to propose the test |
Joore, 2016 [42] | Netherlands | Qualitative study with FGDsb and in depth-interviews, 2014 | 6 FGDs including 81 GPs and in- depth interviews with 9 key-informants | Barriers to provide HIV testing: difficulties in targeting the right group; lack of time; fear of stigmatizing patients. |
Leber, 2015 [53] | UK | Cluster randomised controlled trial among general practices in a multi-ethnic, socioeconomically deprived inner London borough, 2010–2011. Practices were randomised to offer either opt-out rapid testing to newly registering adults or continue usual care. | 20 general practices in the intervention group and 20 in the control group | HIV diagnosis rate was 0.30 [95%CI: 0.11–0.85] per 10,000 patients per year in intervention practices versus 0.07 [95%CI: 0.02–0.20] in control practices. |
Loos, 2014 [48] | Belgium | Qualitative evaluation making use of focus group discussions and in-depth interviews, 2011–2012 | 65 GPs implementing a tool to proactively offer HIV testing to Sub-Saharan African migrants | Barriers to provide HIV testing: feelings of discomfort to offer the test, lack of counselling skills and time constraints. GPs identified training needs on the specificities of the HIV epidemic GPs requested a tool to proactively offer HIV testing to populations at increased risk improved the testing performance. |
Mahendran, 2015 [54] | UK | A single-center observational cohort study in an outpatient HIV department in a secondary care UK hospital assessing the site of initial HIV diagnosis and stage of infection, 2000–2012 | 1359 diagnosed HIV patients | Increase in the proportion of HIV diagnoses made in primary care: from 2.7% in 2000 to 21.2% in 2012. Decrease in the proportion of late diagnoses from 89.5% in 2000 to 42% in 2012. |
Manirankunda, 2012 [49] | Belgium | Qualitative study making use of in-depth interviews, 2007–2008 | 20 GPs in the cities of Ghent and Antwerp | Barriers to provide HIV testing: time constraints, concerns about result management, concerns about lack of access to treatment for migrants in an illegal situation. |
Pilay, 2014 [55] | UK | An interventional study consisting of a training in sexual health skills in a high HIV prevalence London area, 2010–2011 | 51 general practice settings | Testing rates of trained and untrained practices increased from 2.29 to 6.66 and 1.54 to 1.90/1000 registered patients/year. 16.7 positive diagnoses per 1000 tests in trained practices, corresponding to a rise from 9.5 to 22 new diagnoses per year. |
Poirier, 2015 [38] | France | Multi-center observational and interventional study offering rapid HIV testing, 2012–2013 | 352 GPs participating in the questionnaire survey and 23 GPs volunteering to use rapid testing | Barriers to provide rapid HIV testing: difficulties to include preventive screening in GP consultation; low prevalence; immediacy of test results in case of rapid testing. |
Rayment, 2012 [39] | UK | Multi-center cross-sectional questionnaire survey combined with and interventional study offering HIV testing, 2009–2010 | 144 primary care staff, 1320 primary care patients | 72% of GPs identified a need for training to include HIV testing as a routine part of patient care. |
Sicsic, 2016 [56] | France | Retrospective observational study making use of data from the French National health Insurance Fund database, 2006–2013 | 2.176,647 person-years corresponding to 329.748 different individuals aged between 15 and 70 | Annual HIV screening rates increased from 4.2% [95% CI: 4.2–4.3] in 2006 to 5.8% [95% CI: 5.7–5.9] in 2013 with a significant trend after 2010 (p < 0.0001). The increase was stronger for those that regularly consulted a GP: the national screening policy led to a 20.4% increase [95% CI: 17%-23.8] in 2013 compared to a 4.5% increase [95% CI: 4.4–4.5] for those who did not consult a GP regularly in 2013. |
Thornton, 2012 [36] | UK | Qualitative study with FGDs embedded within an interventional study offering routine testing in non-traditional settings including primary care, 2009–2010 | 6 FGDs in the pre-testing phase including 10 GPs; 7 FGDs in the post-testing phase including 8 GPs | Barriers to provide HIV testing: lack of time; concerns about results management. Routine offer to HIV testing in general practice is feasible but requires training and support for staff. |
Tong, 2012 [57] | UK | Prospective interventional study adding a standard comment to encourage inclusion of HIV testing to all Glandular fever screening reports, 2010–2011 | 871 glandular fever screening samples from 865 patients submitted from primary care | After the introduction of the standard comment, 19.6% had a concomitant HIV request as compared to 9.5% in the baseline period. |