Skip to main content

Table 2 The use of apps and sexual behaviors among app-users

From: The use of geosocial networking smartphone applications and the risk of sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author (Year)

Sexual behaviors

APP users

N/Mean

%/SD

Goedel (2016)

Duncan (2016)

App-met IAI partners, P3M

1.46

6.27

App-met RAI partners, P3M

1.07

2.45

Rhoton (2016)

HIV status on GSN app

2.98

8.96

Ko (2016)

Had online sex partners, P3M

352

88.0

Unprotected anal sex online sexual partners, P6M

228

64.8

Unprotected oral sex online sexual partners, P6M

325

88.8

Yeo (2016)

Sexual partnering via apps

  

0

86

40.4

1–3

91

42.7

> 3

36

16.9

Winetrobe (2014)

Rice (2012)

Number of Grindr-met partners, P1M

1.84

2.92

Ever had sex with a partner met on Grindr

147

75.4

Tang (2016)

Number of sex partners found through gay app, P6M

  

1–6

680

82.5

> 6

144

17.5

Number of IAI with partners met through gay app, P6M

  

0–5

629

76.3

> 6

195

23.7

Condomless anal sex with the last partner met through gay app

338

41.0

Not asked for HIV status of the last gay app partner before met in person

550

66.7

Muessig (2013)

LeGrand (2014)

Use phone to find sex partners

11

50.0

Chow (2016)

Chow (2017)

Meeting partners via mobile apps

723

55.0

Grosskopf (2014)

Sex with a man met on the app

35

97.9

UAI with a man met on the app

22

66.7

Only oral or manual sex with a man met on the app

11

47.8

Cao (2017)

No. of sex partners found through the platform, P6M

  

Single

151

31.0

Multiple

336

69.0

  1. Abbreviations: IAI Insertive anal intercourse, RAI Receptive anal intercourse, GSN Geosocial networking, P1M In the past 1 month, P3M In the past 3 months, P6M In the past 6 months, UAI Unprotected anal intercourse