Skip to main content

Table 5 Stepwise Logistic Regression Predicting for At-Risk Gambling compared to Recreational Gambling after Controlling for Number of Gambling Formats Engaged In (n = 6,871)

From: The importance of friends and family to recreational gambling, at-risk gambling, and problem gambling

 

Odds Ratio & 95% C.I.

Wald Statistics

p

Number of gambling formats engaged in

1.63 (1.51, 1.76)

165.0

< .0001

Portion of friends and family regular gamblers

2.12 (1.82, 2.46)

96.6

< .0001

 Raffles

  No

2.13 (1.71, 2.66)

46.1

< .0001

  Yes

Reference group

 Born in United States

  No

1.86 (1.43, 2.42)

21.9

< .0001

  Yes

Reference group

 Casino Gambling

  No

Reference group

20.3

< .0001

  Yes

1.63 (1.32, 2.02)

 Education

  Beyond Bachelor’s degree

Reference group

Reference group

  High school or less

1.93 (1.41, 2.63)

17.1

< .0001

  Bachelor’s or some College

1.25 (.96, 1.63)

2.7

< .0001

 Gender

  Male

1.46 (1.21, 1.76)

16.1

< .0001

  Female

Reference group

Household income

.96 (.94, .99)

11.3

.0002

 Mental health problems past 12 months

  No

Reference group

9.9

< .0001

  Yes

1.45 (1.14, 1.83)

 Alcohol use past 30 days

  No

1.33 (1.08, 1.65)

7.3

< .0001

  Yes

Reference group