Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of Articles That Assessed Stairs

From: Examining the relationships between walkability and physical activity among older persons: what about stairs?

Articles That Included Questions on Stairs (n = 5)

Age of Participants

Geographic Location & Terrain

Walkability Measure Used

Differentiated Between Indoor & Outdoor Stairs

Question (s) on Stairs

De Bourdeaudhuij et al. (2003) [48], De Bourdeaudhuij et al. (2005) [49]

2003: 18–65a

2005: Sample 1: Mean = 35.1 (SD = 11.5); Sample 2: Mean = 34.1 (SD = 12.3)b

Urban (no information on terrain)

Compared (city centre, suburbs, & countryside); no information on terrain

Self-created items on walkability

N (both papers)

“Are the stairs at your work accessible? Safe? Pleasant?” (Y, N, NA)

Kerr et al. (2011) [50]

66+

Urban; Assessed curved paths and path with moderate slope

Audit of Physical Activity Resources for Seniors (APARS)

Y

“Outside stairways (not from building)” (Y/N)

“>  2 staircase” (Y/N),

“>  1 staircase visible from main entrance” (Y/N)

Koh et al. (2015) [51]

65+

Urban; Assessed slopes in neighborhood

Self-created items on walkability

N (appears to focus on outdoor stairs only)

“There are few stairs/slopes in my neighbourhood” [“Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree” (4-point scale)]

Tsai et al. (2013) [52]

75–81

Urban; Terrain was one variable they looked at (defined as hilly terrain and poor street conditions)

Self-created items on walkability

Y

Survey questions not written out in article but they asked about environmental mobility barriers which includes presence of outdoor or indoor stairs in entrances (Y/N)

  1. aNote that older persons made up a small portion of this sample
  2. bAge range was not specified in the article