Skip to main content

Table 2 Model fit statistics and reliability for different models of Motivation and Confidence

From: Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy

  Chi-square Df P CFI RMSEA RMSEA 90% CI λ range Total # of items
Model 1 20.64 2 <.0001 0.877 0.213 0.136, 0.301 0.482–0.796 36
Model 2 16.62 5 0.005 0.946 0.106 0.053, 0.165 0.219–0.741 18
Model 3 13.80 5 0.02 0.923 0.093 0.036, 0.153 0.439–0.663 14
Model 4 4.24 2 0.12 0.978 0.074 0.000, 0.174 0.490–0.760 12
  1. Note. Model 1 = composite scores of original adequacy, original predilection, benefits, barriers, and skills compared to peers. Model 2 = composite scores of intrinsic, identified, introjected, and external regulation as well as competence. Model 3 = composite scores of intrinsic regulation, skill compared to peers, shortened adequacy and shortened predilection, and a behaviour subscale. Model 4 = composite scores of 3 items each for adequacy, predilection, competence, intrinsic motivation
  2. CFI comparative fit index, CI 90% confidence interval Df degrees of freedom, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, λ standardized factor loading