Revising the motivation and confidence domain of the Canadian assessment of physical literacy

BMC Public Health

Table 2 Model fit statistics and reliability for different models of Motivation and Confidence

	Chi-square	Df	P	CFI	RMSEA	RMSEA 90% CI	λ range	Total # of items
Model 1	20.64	2	<.0001	0.877	0.213	0.136, 0.301	0.482–0.796	36
Model 2	16.62	5	0.005	0.946	0.106	0.053, 0.165	0.219–0.741	18
Model 3	13.80	5	0.02	0.923	0.093	0.036, 0.153	0.439–0.663	14
Model 4	4.24	2	0.12	0.978	0.074	0.000, 0.174	0.490–0.760	12

Note. Model 1 = composite scores of original adequacy, original predilection, benefits, barriers, and skills compared to peers. Model 2 = composite scores of intrinsic, identified, introjected, and external regulation as well as competence. Model 3 = composite scores of intrinsic regulation, skill compared to peers, shortened adequacy and shortened predilection, and a behaviour subscale. Model 4 = composite scores of 3 items each for adequacy, predilection, competence, intrinsic motivation
CFI comparative fit index, CI 90% confidence interval Df degrees of freedom, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, λ standardized factor loading

ISSN: 1471-2458