Skip to main content

Table 3 NEMS composite scores by restaurant types in all four towns

From: Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities: use of mixed methods

  

Town Aa

Town B

Town C

Town D

Maximum

Possible Score

SD

FC

SD

FC

FF

SD

FC

FF

SD

FC

FF

Sources of Information

12.0

4.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

6.5

0.8

0.7

3.2

0.0

0.0

2.3

Site Visit Information

9.0

3.0

0.0

0.0

−1.0

1.0

−1.5

−0.9

−0.8

−0.5

0.0

−0.4

Menu Review/Site Visit

12.0

6.0

0.0

0.9

5.0

2.5

2.8

3.0

1.0

2.5

3.0

1.9

Menu Review

18.0

10.0

0.0

5.7

3.3

7.5

6.2

4.7

5.8

5.0

3.5

4.3

Facilitators and Support

9.0

6.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.0

1.9

0.4

1.5

0.5

0.0

0.8

Barriers

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

−1.0

−0.5

−6.4

−0.9

−0.8

0.0

− 1.5

− 0.4

Pricing

3.0

0.0

0.0

−3.0

−2.0

−2.0

−1.5

0.0

− 1.5

− 1.5

−1.5

− 1.1

Children’s Menu

9.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.5

3.8

3.3

6.0

3.8

1.2

0.0

2.0

Composite

72.0

23.0

0.0

3.6

7.3

18.5

10.2

8.0

9.8

7.0

3.5

7.6

  1. SD sit down, FC fast causal, FF fast food
  2. aNo data is available on fast foods as there are no fast foods in this town
  3. NEMS Nutrition Environment Measures Survey
  4. The tool for NEMS for Restaurants are from Saelens et al. [11]
  5. Data collected July–November 2013