Table 3 NEMS composite scores by restaurant types in all four towns
From: Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities: use of mixed methods
Town Aa | Town B | Town C | Town D | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum Possible Score | SD | FC | SD | FC | FF | SD | FC | FF | SD | FC | FF | |
Sources of Information | 12.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 |
Site Visit Information | 9.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 | 1.0 | −1.5 | −0.9 | −0.8 | −0.5 | 0.0 | −0.4 |
Menu Review/Site Visit | 12.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 1.9 |
Menu Review | 18.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Facilitators and Support | 9.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
Barriers | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 | −0.5 | −6.4 | −0.9 | −0.8 | 0.0 | − 1.5 | − 0.4 |
Pricing | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −3.0 | −2.0 | −2.0 | −1.5 | 0.0 | − 1.5 | − 1.5 | −1.5 | − 1.1 |
Children’s Menu | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
Composite | 72.0 | 23.0 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 18.5 | 10.2 | 8.0 | 9.8 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 7.6 |