Skip to main content

Table 3 TB transmission control measures and tuberculin skin test (TST) conversion: Risk of bias assessment and results (nā€‰=ā€‰10)

From: Effectiveness of control measures to prevent occupational tuberculosis infection in health care workers: a systematic review

Studies

Risk of bias

Results

Notes

First author, year.

Similar baseline outcome measures

Similar baseline characteristics

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Blinding or objective assessment of outcome

Protected against contamination

Selective outcome reporting (reporting bias)

Selection and confounding bias

Conversion rate per 100 person years or proportion converting (%) (Bā€‰=ā€‰before, Aā€‰=ā€‰after)

Relative rate or proportion (A/B)

B1, B2, A1, A2, etc., if more than two cycles.

Studies reporting rates of conversion

Bangsberg, 1997 [31]

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

N/A

Low

High

B1: 5.8

B1:1.00

Ā 

B2: 5.1

B2: 0.88

A1: 0.0

A1: 0.00

A2: 2.3

A2: 0.40

A3: 0.0

A3: 0.00

Louther, 1997 [32]

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

N/A

Low

High

B: 7.2 (65/898)

B: 1.00

Fella et al. [20] describing same study, mention possible overestimate of conversions in before period.

A: 3.3 (32/971)

A: 0.46

Blumberg, 1998 [34]

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

N/A

Low

High

B: 5.98

B: 1.00

Ā 

A: 1.09

A: 0.18

Yanai, 2003 [35]

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

N/A

Low

Low

Ā 

Univariate:

Multivariate adjustment for sex, age, area TB risk, BCG scar, duration of work (ā‰¤ā€‰12 vsā€‰>ā€‰12Ā months) and frequency of patient contact.

aDiscrepancy between rates and rate ratios in Table 2 of article ā€“ figures here are recalculations.

B: 9.3

B: 1.00

A1: 6.4

A1: 0.69a

A2: 2.2

A2: 0.24a

Multivariate:

A1: 0.40

A2: 0.01

da Costa, 2009 [15]

N/A

N/A

High

Low

N/A

Low

High

B: 4.8c

B: 1.00

cConverted from person-months to person-years.

High loss to follow up reported.

A: 3.1

A: 0.65

Studies reporting only counts, i.e. proportions converting in each period

Blumberg,

1995 [27]

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

N/A

Low

High

B: 118/3579 (3.3%)

1.00

Each period 6Ā months.

A1: 51/2975 (1.7%)

0.51

A2: 67/4715 (1.4%

0.42

A3: 30/4775 (0.6%)

0.18

A4: 23/5153 (0.4%)

0.12

Jarvis, 1995 [28]

High

Unclear

Highd

Low

Low

Low

High

Intervention groups:

Hospital ā€œAā€

Ā 

dAuthors reported insufficient TST data from control hospital.

After period unspecified.

B: 7/29 (24.1%)

1.00

A: 0/23 (0%)

0.00

Hospital ā€œDā€

Ā 

B: 15/123 (12.2%)

1.00

A: 5/150 (3.3%)

0.27

Control:

Hospital ā€œBā€

Ā 

B: 2/22 (9.1%)

1.00

A: 6/33 (18.2%)

2.00

Maloney, 1995 [29]

High

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Intervention group:

Wards with TB patients

ā€“

ePeriods differed in duration: 18 vs 14Ā months. Before proportion standardised to 14Ā months.

B: 15/90 (16.7%)

12e/90 (13.3%)

-

1.00

A: 4/78 (5.1%)

0.38

Controls:

Other wards

Ā 

B: 7/254 (2.8%)

1.00

A: 9/228 (3.9%)

1.39

Wenger, 1995 [30]

N/A

N/A

Unclear

Low

N/A

Low

High

B: 7/25 (28%)

1.00

Periods differed in duration: 5 vs 9 and 16Ā months. Given zero count in A2, no period adjustment needed.

A1: 3/17 (17.6%)

0.63

A2: 0/23 (0%)

0.00

Behrman, 1998 [33]

High

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Intervention group:

Emergency Department

Ā 

Each period 12Ā months.

Possible co-intervention via increased staff vigilance regarding early diagnosis and use of respirators.

B: 6/50 (12%)

1.00

A: 0/64 (0%)

0.00

Controls: Other hospital employees

Ā 

B: 51/2514 (2.0%)

1.00

A: 36/3000 (1.2%)

0.60

  1. N/A not applicable