Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of the dietary support intervention versus the social support control condition; results are log values

From: Economic evaluation of a dietary intervention for adults with major depression (the “SMILES” trial)

 

Model 1: glm (without adjustment)

 

Model 2: glm (adjusted)a

  

Coefficient

Std. Error

95% CI

P value

Coefficient

Std. Error

95% CI

P value

ITT (imputation used)

 QALYs

0.026

0.063

−0.097

0.150

0.675

0.017

0.066

−0.113

0.147

0.798

 Health sector costs

−0.638

0.277

−1.182

−0.093

0.022

−0.605

0.262

−1.119

−0.091

0.021

 Societal costs

−0.630

0.205

−1.032

−0.227

0.002

−0.676

0.195

−1.058

−0.293

0.001

Complete Cases

 QALYs

0.036

0.074

−0.108

0.181

0.623

0.039

0.078

−0.113

0.192

0.614

 Health sector costs

−0.690

0.289

−1.255

−0.124

0.017

−0.603

0.269

−1.131

−0.075

0.025

 Societal costs

−0.675

0.271

−1.206

−0.143

0.013

−0.535

0.249

−1.023

−0.046

0.032

  1. amodels with QALYs were adjusted for age and gender; cost models were adjusted for age, gender, baseline utility value and baseline cost