Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Improving public health evaluation: a qualitative investigation of practitioners' needs

Original Submission
10 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Denford
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Denford
9 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Abbott
7 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vivek Goel
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Denford
16 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Abbott
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Denford
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Denford
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
12 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12889-018-5075-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page