|
Time 1 outcome measures
|
---|
|
Target policy supporta
|
Anti-industry beliefsb
|
Average non-target policy supportc
|
---|
|
B (95% CI)
|
β
|
p
|
B (95% CI)
|
β
|
p
|
B (95% CI)
|
β
|
p
|
---|
Message condition
|
Control
|
Ref
| | |
Ref
| | |
Ref
| | |
Standard pro-policy arguments (Standard)
|
0.11 (−0.03, 0.25)
|
0.02
|
.137
|
−0.05 (−0.14, 0.04)
|
−0.02
|
.263
|
−0.02 (−0.14, 0.09)
|
−0.01
|
.691
|
Standard + inoculation
|
0.09 (−0.06, 0.23)
|
0.02
|
.249
|
0.04 (−0.05, 0.13)
|
0.01
|
.363
|
0.02 (−0.09, 0.13)
|
0.01
|
.748
|
Standard + narrative
|
0.19 (0.04, 0.33)
|
0.04
|
.012
|
−0.03 (−0.11, 0.06)
|
−0.01
|
.573
|
0.06 (−0.05, 0.18)
|
0.02
|
.275
|
Standard + inoculation + narrative
|
0.10 (−0.04, 0.25)
|
0.02
|
.157
|
0.03 (−0.06, 0.12)
|
0.01
|
.508
|
−0.07 (−0.18, 0.05)
|
−0.02
|
.248
|
Covariates
|
Health policy assignment
|
20% tax on sugary drinks
|
Ref
| | |
Ref
| | |
Ref
| | |
Removal of sugary drink sponsorship from sport
|
0.73 (0.60, 0.86)
|
0.17
|
<.001
|
0.10 (0.02, 0.17)
|
0.04
|
.018
|
−0.39 (−0.49, −0.29)
|
−0.12
|
<.001
|
Volume-based tax on alcohol
|
0.11 (−0.02, 0.24)
|
0.03
|
.094
|
−0.18 (−0.26, −0.11)
|
−0.07
|
<.001
|
−0.07 (−0.17, 0.04)
|
−0.02
|
.205
|
Removal of alcohol sponsorship from sport
|
0.72 (0.59, 0.85)
|
0.17
|
<.001
|
−0.15 (−0.23, −0.07)
|
−0.06
|
<.001
|
−0.44 (−0.54, −0.34)
|
−0.13
|
<.001
|
Age (years)
|
18–24
|
Ref
| | |
Ref
| | |
Ref
| | |
25–34
|
0.29 (0.08, 0.49)
|
0.05
|
.007
|
0.15 (0.03, 0.28)
|
0.05
|
.017
|
0.12 (−0.04, 0.28)
|
0.03
|
.136
|
35–44
|
0.32 (0.11, 0.53)
|
0.06
|
.002
|
0.24 (0.12, 0.37)
|
0.08
|
<.001
|
0.16 (−0.00, 0.32)
|
0.04
|
.057
|
45–54
|
0.11 (−0.10, 0.31)
|
0.02
|
.301
|
0.39 (0.26, 0.51)
|
0.13
|
<.001
|
0.16 (0.01, 0.32)
|
0.04
|
.042
|
55–64
|
0.50 (0.31, 0.70)
|
0.11
|
<.001
|
0.47 (0.35, 0.59)
|
0.17
|
<.001
|
0.34 (0.19, 0.49)
|
0.10
|
<.001
|
65 and older
|
0.82 (0.64, 1.01)
|
0.20
|
<.001
|
0.54 (0.43, 0.66)
|
0.21
|
<.001
|
0.60 (0.45, 0.75)
|
0.19
|
<.001
|
-
B unstandardised regression coefficient; CI confidence interval; β standardised regression coefficient; Ref referent category in linear regression model. Boldfaced results are significant at p < .05
-
aParticipants’ level of support for their assigned policy at t1 which was recorded on a 7-point scale (1 = strongly oppose to 7 = strongly support)
-
bFor participants assigned to a sugary drink policy, the anti-industry beliefs measured were that sugary drink companies: “deny that sugary drinks cause obesity”; “only care about making a lot of money”; “try to get young people to drink sugary drinks”. For participants assigned to an alcohol policy, the anti-industry beliefs measured were that alcohol companies: “deny they market their products to young people”; “only care about making a lot of money”; “try to get young people to drink alcohol”. Participants’ level of agreement with their three anti-industry beliefs at t1 were recorded on 7-point scales (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree), and subsequently averaged to create this outcome measure
-
cFor participants assigned to the “20% tax on sugary drinks” policy, the two non-targeted policies were removal of sugary drink sponsorship from sport and health warning labels on sugary drinks. For participants assigned to the “removal of sugary drink sponsorship from sport” policy, the two non-targeted policies were a 20% tax on sugary drinks and health warning labels on sugary drinks. For participants assigned to the “volume based tax on alcohol” policy, the two non-targeted policies were removal of alcohol sponsorship from sport and health warning labels on alcohol containers. For participants assigned to the “removal of alcohol sponsorship from sport” policy, the two non-targeted policies were a volume based tax on alcohol and health warning labels on alcohol containers. Participants’ level of support for their two non-targeted policies at t1 were recorded on 7-point scales (1 = strongly oppose to 7 = strongly support), and subsequently averaged to create this outcome measure