Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the mediating effect of lifestyle on the association between social capital and PWB

From: Social capital and health in China: exploring the mediating role of lifestyle

  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Social capital
 Social trust
  Low 1.00 1.00 1.00
  High 1.491 (1.395–1.593)*** 1.440 (1.346–1.541)*** 1.425 (1.331–1.524)***
 Social relationship
  Not harmonious 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Harmonious 1.400 (1.291–1.517)*** 1.363 (1.258–1.477)*** 1.353 (1.249–1.466)***
 CCP membership
  No 1.00 1.00 1.00
  Yes 1.299(1.168–1.444)*** 1.008 (0.903–1.126) 0.999 (0.895–1.116)
Socio-demographic variables
 Gender
  Female   1.00 1.00
  Male   1.336 (1.258–1.419)*** 1.402 (1.301–1.510)***
 Age in years   0.998 (0.995–1.001) 0.999 (0.996–1.002)
 Area of living
  Rural   1.00 1.00
  Urban   1.027 (0.912–1.156) 1.027 (0.912–1.157)
 Education in years   1.033 (1.023–1.044)*** 1.032 (1.022–1.043)***
 Marital status
  Never married   1.00 1.00
  Married/cohabitation   1.168 (1.045–1.306)*** 1.175 (1.049–1.316)***
  WSD   0.868 (0.742–1.015)* 0.883 (0.754–1.034)
 Family size   1.020 (1.000–1.040)* 1.020 (1.000–1.040)*
 Log of income per capita   1.143 (1.108–1.178)*** 1.139 (1.105–1.175)***
 Job status
  Other job types   1.00 1.00
  Agriculture worker   1.081 (0.957–1.222) 1.100 (0.973–1.244)
  Private business   0.926 (0.842–1.018) 0.942 (0.856–1.036)
  Waged job   1.002 (0.915–1.098) 1.029 (0.939–1.128)
Lifestyle factors
 Healthy diet
  No    1.00
  Yes    1.505 (1.234–1.834)***
 Physical activity
  No    1.00
  Yes    1.065 (0.988–1.147)*
 Smoking
  Yes    1.00
  No    0.918 (0.844–0.998)**
 Sleeping
  Poor    1.00
  Good    1.277 (1.199–1.361)***
 Non-overweight
  No    1.00
  Yes    0.921 (0.856–0.990)**
  1. ***p < 0.001 **p < 0.05 * p < 0.1