Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals of the mediating effect of lifestyle on the association between social capital and PWB

From: Social capital and health in China: exploring the mediating role of lifestyle

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Social capital

 Social trust

  Low

1.00

1.00

1.00

  High

1.491 (1.395–1.593)***

1.440 (1.346–1.541)***

1.425 (1.331–1.524)***

 Social relationship

  Not harmonious

1.00

1.00

1.00

  Harmonious

1.400 (1.291–1.517)***

1.363 (1.258–1.477)***

1.353 (1.249–1.466)***

 CCP membership

  No

1.00

1.00

1.00

  Yes

1.299(1.168–1.444)***

1.008 (0.903–1.126)

0.999 (0.895–1.116)

Socio-demographic variables

 Gender

  Female

 

1.00

1.00

  Male

 

1.336 (1.258–1.419)***

1.402 (1.301–1.510)***

 Age in years

 

0.998 (0.995–1.001)

0.999 (0.996–1.002)

 Area of living

  Rural

 

1.00

1.00

  Urban

 

1.027 (0.912–1.156)

1.027 (0.912–1.157)

 Education in years

 

1.033 (1.023–1.044)***

1.032 (1.022–1.043)***

 Marital status

  Never married

 

1.00

1.00

  Married/cohabitation

 

1.168 (1.045–1.306)***

1.175 (1.049–1.316)***

  WSD

 

0.868 (0.742–1.015)*

0.883 (0.754–1.034)

 Family size

 

1.020 (1.000–1.040)*

1.020 (1.000–1.040)*

 Log of income per capita

 

1.143 (1.108–1.178)***

1.139 (1.105–1.175)***

 Job status

  Other job types

 

1.00

1.00

  Agriculture worker

 

1.081 (0.957–1.222)

1.100 (0.973–1.244)

  Private business

 

0.926 (0.842–1.018)

0.942 (0.856–1.036)

  Waged job

 

1.002 (0.915–1.098)

1.029 (0.939–1.128)

Lifestyle factors

 Healthy diet

  No

  

1.00

  Yes

  

1.505 (1.234–1.834)***

 Physical activity

  No

  

1.00

  Yes

  

1.065 (0.988–1.147)*

 Smoking

  Yes

  

1.00

  No

  

0.918 (0.844–0.998)**

 Sleeping

  Poor

  

1.00

  Good

  

1.277 (1.199–1.361)***

 Non-overweight

  No

  

1.00

  Yes

  

0.921 (0.856–0.990)**

  1. ***p < 0.001 **p < 0.05 * p < 0.1