From action planning and plan enactment to fruit consumption: moderated mediation effects

BMC Public Health

Table 4 Regression models testing moderated mediation^a

	Moderators
	Intention		Self-efficacy		Habit Fruit		Habit Snacks
	Coef	95% CI	Coef	95% CI	Coef	95% CI	Coef	95% CI
Conditional indirect effects^b
Level = 1	.46	.05–1.02	−.05	−.56–.14	−.01	−.28–.16	.70***	.37–1.08
Level = 2	.49*	.15–.94	−.01	−.48–.20	.04	−.23–.23	.54***	.31–.81
Level = 3	.51**	.21–.88	.07	−.29–.32	.12	−.12–.31	.40***	.18–.63
Level = 4	.53***	.29–.79	.21	−.07–.41	.23*	. 04–.44	.28*	.01–.56
Level = 5	.53***	.30–.78	.39***	.19–.61	.38***	.18–.62	.18	−.14–.54
Level = 6	.53***	.23–.87	.61***	.35–.93	.57***	.29–.90	.09	−.31–.51
Level = 7	.51*	.07–1.00	.89***	.43–1.43	.79***	.37–1.29	.02	−.44–.50

^a:Probed values based on the Johnson-Neyman technique, with bootstrapped confidence intervals (5000 samples)
^b: All analysis were corrected for baseline fruit consumption, sex, age and educational level
*p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001

ISSN: 1471-2458