Table 2 Data sources and constructs assessed
Data source | Indicators assessed/collected | Objectives addressed | Implementation constructs assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
Interviews/ focus groups with coordinators | • Leadership | 1 | Recruitment (Reach) |
|  | • Project implementation including: context, recruitment and engagement of communities, working with local authorities and other partners, delivery of different intervention activities | 3 | Implementation processes (Adaptation) |
|  | • Barriers and facilitators for implementation | 4 | Factors affecting implementation |
|  | • Sustainability |  |  |
Implementation log | • Name of the registered group | 1 | Recruitment (Reach) |
|  | • Key dates: |  |  |
| Â | Date of registration, date of community street audit, date FFW award presented, end date of project | Â | Â |
|  | • Community characteristics: Target community, estimated size of the community on which the project might have an impact (number of individuals or households) |  |  |
|  | • Location/route characteristics: |  |  |
| Â | The main route/area of interest and any local key destinations or trip generators | Â | Â |
|  | • Project information: |  |  |
| Â | How the group was identified/recruited, the priorities of the group for the project | Â | Â |
|  | • Barriers to walking | 2 | What was delivered (Dosage) |
|  | • Environmental improvements and activities delivered |  |  |
|  | • Key stakeholders and partners involved in the project |  |  |
|  | • Additional funding identified for project activities |  |  |
|  | • Challenges specific to each project |  |  |
Attendance records | • Number of people attending events, community meetings and led activities | 1 | Participation (Reach) |
Pledge cards | • Number of pledge cards distributed/completed | 1 | Participation (Reach) |
Route user counts | • Number of people walking on specified routes in five FFW projects | 1 | Participation (Reach) |