Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted mean (sd) or proportion adiposity values (WHO cut-offs) and intervention effect post intervention (2009)

From: Cluster randomised trial of a school-community child health promotion and obesity prevention intervention: findings from the evaluation of fun ‘n healthy in Moreland!

  DESCRIPTIVE MODELS
Comparison Intervention Crude modela Adjusted modelb
N mean or % sd N mean or % sd Comparative statisticc Comparative statisticc 95% CI p ICC
weight (kg) 1439 31.87 10.52 1320 31.38 10.33 −0.98 −0.56 −1.40 to 0.29 0.20 0.007
bmi 1437 17.95 3.16 1320 17.82 3.03 −0.24 −0.16 −0.51 to 0.18 0.36 0.010
bmizscored 1425 0.72 1.12 1318 0.68 1.16 −0.04 −0.05 −0.19 to 0.08 0.44 0.008
waist (cm)e 1437 63.1 9.28 1326 62.87 8.81 −0.64 −0.72 −2.17 to 0.74 0.33 0.038
overweight/obesed 1421 36.7%   1315 35.1%   0.90 0.96 0.77 to 1.20 0.72 0.003
obesed 1421 12.1%   1315 13.5%   1.10 1.10 0.80 to 1.51 0.57 0.004
  1. aAdjusted for mean weight at baseline
  2. bAdjusted for school mean adiposity score at baseline, age, sex, SEP(maternal education, SEIFA), ethnicity (only English spoken at home)
  3. cOdds ratio for binary outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes
  4. dWHO reference and cut-off points
  5. eBaseline school mean bmi z-score used as proxy as waist not measured at baseline
  6. Nsample size
  7. ICCintra-cluster (intra-school) correlation coefficient