Skip to main content

Table 4 Health facility factors with intention to screen and willingness to vaccinate daughters against cervical cancer

From: Women’s intention to screen and willingness to vaccinate their daughters against cervical cancer – a cross sectional study in eastern Uganda

  Intention to screen (n = 819) Willingness to vaccinate daughters (n = 813)
Characteristic N (%) Unadjusted PR (95% CI) p-value N (%) Unadjusted PR (95% CI) p-value
Where health care is accessed when sick
Private facility 166 (97.1)    168 (96.5)   
Government facility 653 (92.6) 0.95 [0.92–0.99] 0.006* 645 (92.4) 0.96 [0.92–0.99] 0.015*
Where reproductive health care is accessed
Private facility 153 (96.8)    157 (97.5)   
Government facility 666 (92.8) 0.96 [0.92–0.99] 0.016* 656 (92.3) 0.95 [0.91–0.98] 0.001*
Ease of access of reproductive health care
Very/somewhat difficult 372 (92.8)    378 (94.9)   
Not difficult 447 (94.1) 1.01 [0.98–1.05] 0.428 435 (91.8) 0.97 [0.93–1.00] 0.056
Have challenges in accessing reproductive health care
Yes 480 (92.5)    487 (94.0)   
No 339 (95.0) 1.02 [0.99–1.06] 0.131 326 (92.1) 0.98 [0.94–1.02] 0.279
Ever been recommended for screening by health worker
No 749 (94.0)    737 (92.9)   
Yes 70 (88.6) 0.94 [0.87–1.02] 0.155 76 (96.2) 1.03 [0.99–1.08] 0.157
Knew where cervical cancer screening is provided
No 496 (95.7)    489 (95.9)   
Yes 323 (90.2) 0.94 [0.91–0.98] 0.003* 324 (89.5) 0.93 [0.89–0.97] 0.001*
Distance to health facility where screening is done (n–372)
5 or more km 140 (84.8)    139 (84.2)   
Less than 5 km 183 (94.8) 1.12 [1.04–1.20] 0.003* 187 (94.9) 1.13 [1.05–1.21] 0.001*
Distance to nearest health facility
5 or more km 128 (91.4)    125 (89.9)   
Less than 5 km 691 (93.9) 1.03 [0.97–1.08] 0.336 688 (93.9) 1.04 [0.98–1.10] 0.153
  1. *p < 0.05