Authors, year publication, Country (subjects studied) | Exposures investigated (instruments used) | Employee groups (types of work), number of subjects | Outcomes (definition of disability), number of cases | Summary (with OR, RR, HR) | Control for confounders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahola et al., 2011, Finland [48] | Weekly hours; job strain (JCQ) (no test of control and demands); team climate (HOQ); job insecurity | General working population, n = 3164 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 208 | Weekly hours (>40): OR = 0.78 (0.46–1.31) High job strain: OR = 1.78 (1.10–2.87) Poor team climate: OR = 1.25 (0.87–1.79) Job insecurity: OR = 1.23 (0.90–1.69) | Sex, age, mental and physical health, marital status, occupational grade, work-related factors, health behavior |
Appelberg et al., 1996, Finland [12] | Interpersonal conflict at work | General working population, n = 15,348 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 364 | Women: interpersonal conflict: RR = 1.56 (1.01–2.39) Men: interpersonal conflict: RR = 1.15 (0.74–1.81) | Sex, age, social class, general health status |
Blekesaune et al., 2005, Norway [75] | Job stress (two single items); Decision authority (two single items) (job exposure matrix, no validated instruments) | General working population, n = 19,114 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 1257 | Men Job stress: logit = 0.08 (p > 0.05) Low autonomy: logit = 0.11 (p < 0.05) Women Job stress: logit = −0.05 (p > 0.05) Low autonomy: logit = −0.08 (p > 0.05) | Age, sex, marital status, income, physical job strain |
Brage et al., 2007, Norway [61] | Organizational job stress; psychological job stress | General working population, n = 1152 | Low back disability, defined as long term sickness absence (>56 days), rehabilitation allowance or disability awards, registry, n = 131 | Organizational job stress: RR = 1.18 (0.97–1.43) Psychological job stress: RR = 1.17 (0.97–1.43) | Sex, age, marital status, education, life-style, psychosocial factors, emotional distress, work-related factors |
Canivet et al., 2012, Sweden [54] | Job demands (JCQ), decision latitude (JCQ), job strain (JCQ), job support (Swedish version of JCQ) | Middle-aged general working population, n = 3359 women & 3181 men | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 672 women & 477men | Men High strain: HR = 1.9 (1.4–2.7) High demands: HR = 1.7 (1.3–2.2) Low decision latitude: HR = 1.4 (1.1–1.9) Low support: HR = 1.3 (1.1–1.6) Women High strain: HR = 2.1 (1.6–2.7) High demands: HR = 1.8 (1.5–2.2) Low decision latitude: HR = 1.4 (1.1–1.8) Low support: HR = 1.2 (1.03–1.4) | Sex, age, health status, occupational class, marital status, economical situation, alcohol consumption, smoking, BMI |
Christensen et al., 2008, Denmark [70] | Decision authority (single item); information; variation in work | General working population, n = 8298 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 447 | Men: Low decision authority: HR = 1.82 (1.26–2.63) Low variation in work: HR = 1.75 (1.21–2.53) Low information: HR = 0.96 (0.65–1.43) Women: Low decision authority: HR = 1.41 (1.02–1.96) Low variation in work: HR = 1.40 (1.06–1.84) Low information: RR = 1.34 (0.95–1.89) | Age, sex, smoking, BMI, ergonomic work environment exposures |
Clausen et al., 2014, Denmark [76] | Influence at work (four items), Quality of leadership (four items), Work pace (single item), Quantitative demands (single item) All items from COPSOQ | General working population, n = 40,554 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 929 | Influence at work (ref = high) Medium HR = 0.95 (0.85–1.13) Low HR = 1.28 (1.05–1.55) Quality of leadership (ref = high) Medium HR = 0.87 (0.73–1.03) Low HR = 0.91 (0.76–1.11) Work pace (ref = low) Medium HR = 0.90 (0.71–1.14) High HR = 1.06 (0.84–1.34) Quantitative demands (ref = low) Medium HR = 0.82 (0.69–0.97) High HR = 0.93 (0.77–1.12) Interaction effects Influence at work*Quantitative demands p = 0.65 Influence at work*Work pace p = 0.69 Quality of leadership*Quantitative demands p  < 0.01 Quality of leadership *Work pace p  < 0.01 | Age, sex, smoking, occupational group, psychosocial work conditions |
Claussen et al., 2009, Norway [56] | Job control (decision authority); shift work | General working population, n = 9195 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 498 | Job control: OR = 2.07 (1.71–2.71) Shift work: OR = 1.07 (0.71–1.57) Job strain: OR = 1.17 (0.96–1.42) | Sex, age, income, occupation, general health, mental distress |
Claussen et al., 2009, Norway [57] | Job control (decision authority); shift work | General working population, n = 9195 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 498 | Job control: OR = 1.82 (1.35–2.44) Shift work: OR = 1.07 (0.71–1.61) Job strain: OR = 1.17 (0.96–1.42) | Sex, age, ethnic group, income, occupation, general health, mental distress |
Falkstedt et al., 2014, Sweden [77] | Job control (job exposure matrix–decision authority/skill discretion0) | Cohort of all Swedish children born in 1948 and 1953, men n = 7920/women n = 7191 | Disability pension awards, registry, men n = 811/women n = 1372 | Men Job control (ref: high) Medium-High HR = 1.64 (1.35–1.98) Medium-Low HR = 2.01 (1.64–2.47) Low HR = 2.26 1.87–2.73) Women Job control (ref: high) Medium-High HR = 1.27 (1.02–1.55) Medium-Low HR = 1.26 (1.02–1.58) Low HR = 1.85 (1.50–2.28) | Sex, age |
Friis et al., 2008, Denmark [52] | Working schedule; work speed/pressure; busy at work; influence at work (single item) | All Danish nurses, n = 12,028 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 689 | Working schedule (ref = day) Evening work: HR = 1.51 (1.21–1.89) Night work: HR = 1.45 (1.11–1.91) Shift work: HR = 0.94 (0.73–1.20) Busy at work (ref = almost always) Often/sometimes: HR = 0.91 (0.70–1.19) Not often/never: HR = 0.86 (0.63–1.18) Work speed/pressure: HR = 1.10 (0.94–1.29) Influence at work (major): HR = 1.39 (1.17–1.67) | Sex, age, working area, psychical demands, leisure time physical activity, BMI, alcohol, smoking, marital status and spouse’s income, income, place of residence |
Hagen et al., 2002, Norway [58] | Excessive job demands, authority to plan own work, concentration and attention | General working population, n = 34,754 | Disability pension awards due to back pain, registry, n = 715 | None significant results in the fully adjusted model (fully adjusted estimates not shown) | Sex, age, occupational factors, general health status, health behavior, psychological and social variables |
Hagen et al., 2006, Norway [74] | Concentration and attention; Stress and tension; Authority to plan own work (single item) | General working population, n = 38,426 | Disability pension awards due to back disease, registry, n = 4146 | Concentration and attention (ref = almost never) Fairly infrequently HR = 1.2 (0.8–1.8) Fairly often HR = 1.6 (1.1–2.4) Nearly always HR = 2.6 (1.6–4.1) Stress and tension (ref = not at all) Not much HR = 0.7 (0.5–0.9) A good deal HR = 0.8 (0.6–1.0) Almost all the time HR = 0.9 (0.6–1.3) Authority to plan own work (ref = almost all the time) A good deal HR = 0.9 (0.7–1.1) Not much HR = 1.1 (0.9–1.5) Not at all HR = 1.5 (1.3–2.1) | Sex, age |
Hinkka et al., 2013, Finland [59] | Shift work, work control (single item; decision authority), opportunities for mental growth, support from supervisor, feedback from supervisor | Random sample of civil service employees, n = 937 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 44 | Shift work (ref = daytime) Shift or period work: HR = 3.64 (1.66–7.99) Part-time work: HR = 2.29 (0.48–10.95) Work control (ref = low) Moderate: HR = 0.68 (0.32–1.45) High: HR = 0.25 (0.07–0.87) Mental growth (ref = rather or very little) Somewhat: HR = 0.89 (0.41–1.93) Rather or very much: HR = 1.07 (0.43–2.68) Support (ref = almost never or seldom) Sometimes HR = 0.99 (0.47–2.11) Rather or very often: HR = 0.39 (0.15–1.02) Feedback (ref = almost never or seldom) Sometimes HR = 0.87 (0.40–1.89) Rather or very often: HR = 1.28 (0.44–3.73) | Sex, age, education, occupational class, physical work exposure, physical activity |
Holmberg et al., 2006, Sweden [66] | Job demands (JCQ); decision latitude (JCQ) | Rural male farmers and non-farmers, n = 1347 (cases = 39) | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 39 | None significant results in the fully adjusted model (fully adjusted estimates not shown) | Sex, age, occupation (farmer/non-farmer), psychical work load, education, BMI, tobacco, alcohol, psychiatric symptoms, specific low back symptoms |
Hublin et al., 2010, Finland [32] | Shift work | General working population, n = 20,142 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 857 | Shift work (ref = daytime) All men: Night time T1 or T2: RR = 0.51 (0.17–1.49) Shift work T1: RR = 1.12 (0.70–1.78) Shift work T2: RR = 1.13 (0.67–1.90) Shift work T1 and T2: RR = 0.70 (0.48–1.03) All women: Night time T1 or T2: RR = 0.94 (0.35–2.51) Shift work T1: RR = 0.93 (0.48–1.82) Shift work T2: RR = 1.32 (0.72–2.40) Shift work T1 and T2: RR = 0.79 (0.43–1.43) | Sex, age, marital status, social class, education, smoking, binge drinking/alcohol consumption, hypertension, BMI, physical activity, work-related factors, general health factors, life satisfaction |
Jensen et al., 2012, Denmark [55] | Decision latitude (JCQ), demands (JCQ, the Danish version), shift work | Gainfully employed nurses’ aides, n = 3332 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 540 (Additionally: voluntary early retirement) | Decision latitude (ref = high): HR = 0.90 (0.72–1.12) Demands (ref = low): HR = 0.92 (0.75–1.13) Shift work (ref = mainly day work) Mainly evening work: HR = 1.29 (1.03–1.60) Mainly night work: HR = 1.18 (0.87–1.61) Mixed: HR = 0.97 (0.74–1.27) | Sex, age, marital status, health status, BMI, smoking, physical activity, education, mechanical work load |
Juvani et al., 2014, Finland [78] | Effort-reward imbalance (one item on effort and three items on rewards, adapted from the standard 10 item ERI scale developed by J. Siegrist) | Cohort of public-sector employees, n = 51,874 | Disability pension awards due to all diagnosis (n = 4542), depression (n = 890), musculoskeletal diagnoses (n = 2001), ischemic heart disease (n = 87), registry | Work unit-level ERI All diagnosis 4th highest HR = 1.07 (0.97–1.18) Depression 4th highest HR = 1.63 (1.31–2.04) Musculoskeletal 4th highest HR = 1.02 (0.88–1.99) Ischemic heart disease 4th highest HR = 0.95 (0.48–1.88) Individual-level ERI All diagnosis 4th highest HR = 133 (1.20–1.47) Depression 4th highest HR = 1.90 (1.51–2.40) Musculoskeletal 4th highest HR = 1.32 (1.13–1.53) Ischemic heart disease 4th highest HR = 0.93 (0.47–1.84) | Sex, age, place of residence, socioeconomic status, baseline health and work-related characteristics (Job strain) |
Karkkainen et al., 2013, Finland [65] | Work-time schedules (day, night, evening, shift work) | General working population (Finnish twins), n = 16,028 | Disability pension awards due to musculoskeletal diagnoses, registry, n = 1297 | Work type (ref = day work) Night: HR = 0.74 (0.17–3.18) Evening: HR = 3.61 (1.21–10.76) Shift: HR = 1.17 (0.83–1.65) (NB: insignificant results for within twin pairs) | Sex, age, BMI, marital status, physical work exposure, education, occupational class, physical activity |
Krause et al., 1997, Finland [62] | Weekly work hours; Overwork index; Shift work; Deadlines (ref = weekly or less, daily or more often) | General male working population, n = 968 | Disability pension awards, questionnaire, n = 67 | Weekly work hours (ref= > 40) 40–44: OR = 1.26 (p > 0.05) 45–59: OR = 1.49 (p > 0.05) > = 60: OR = 2.49 ( p  < 0.05) Overwork: OR = 1.31 (p > 0.05) Shift work (ref = no shift) Regular shift: OR = 0.24 ( p  < 0.05) Irregular shift: OR = 0.98 (p > 0.05) Deadlines (ref = weekly or less) Daily or more: OR = 1.22 (p > 0.05) | Sex, age, economic factors, health status, health behavior |
Krokstad et al., 2002, Norway [50] | Job control (decision authority); high demands in concentration and attention | General working population, n = 62,369 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 4750 | Men (20–49 y) Job control (ref = high): HR = 1.40 (1.00–1.94) Men (50–66 y) Job control (ref = high): HR = 1.34 (1.13–1.59) Psych. demands (ref = low): HR = 1.11 (0.99–1.25) Women (20–49 y) Job control (ref = high): HR = 1.29 (1.04–1.60) Women (50–66 y) Job control (ref = high): HR = 1.31 (1.09–1.59) Psych. demands (ref = low): HR = 1.33 (1.13–1.57) | Sex, age, educational level, employment status, health status, psychosocial risk factors, health behaviour |
Labriola et al., 2007, Denmark [71] | Decision authority (ref = high); skill discretion (ref = high); social support (ref = high); conflicts (ref = low); psychological demands (ref = low) (JCQ) | General working population, n = 4177 (cases = 140) | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 140 | Decision authority: OR = 1.14 (0.77–1.71) Skill discretion: OR = 1.24 (0.82–1.86) Social support: OR = 0.73 (0.48–1.12) Conflicts: OR = 1.20 (0.78–1.84) Psychological demands: OR = 0.90 (0.59–1.38) | Sick leave, gender, age, socioeconomic position, smoking, BMI, ergonomic work-related factors |
Lahelma et al., 2012, Finland [60] | Work arrangements (shift work; temporary work contract; working overtime (hours > 40 per week)), decision latitude (JCQ), job demands (JCQ), social support (Sarason) | Employees of the city of Helsinki, n = 6525 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 525 | All-cause disability Men Shift work (ref = no): HR = 1.16 (0.70–1.93) Temporary work (ref = no): HR = 0.84 (0.36–1.96) Overtime (ref = no): HR = 0.95 (0.56–1.60) Low decision latitude: HR = 1.41 (0.90–2.21) High job demands: HR = 0.75 (0.40–1.39) Social support: HR = 0.88 (0.57–1.37) Women Shift work (ref = no): HR = 1.02 (0.79–1.31) Temporary work (ref = no): HR = 1.03 (0.75–1.42) Overtime (ref = no): HR = 1.02 (0.75–1.39) Low decision latitude: HR = 1.34 (1.07–1.68) High job demands: HR = 1.13 (0.88–1.44) Social support: HR = 0.92 (0.74–1.15) Musculoskeletal diseases Shift work (ref = no): HR = 1.04 (0.75–1.44) Temporary work (ref = no): HR = 0.70 (0.40–1.20) Overtime (ref = no): HR = 0.85 (0.53–1.36) Low job control: HR = 1.44 (1.07–1.93) High job demands: HR = 0.94 (0.65–1.34) Social support: HR = 0.80 (0.58–1.11) Mental disorders Shift work (ref = no): HR = 1.03 (0.66–1.60) Temporary work (ref = no): HR = 1.06 (0.61–1.81) Overtime (ref = no): HR = 1.12 (0.71–1.78) Low job control: HR = 1.67 (1.12–2.49) High job demands: HR = 1.48 (1.00–2.18) Social support: HR = 0.82 (0.56–1.19) | Sex, age, occupational class, physical job exposure |
Laine et al., 2009, Finland [67] | Job strain (JCQ), job control, job demands (JCQ) | Finish public sector employees, n = 25,150 | Retired because of work disability, questionnaire, n = 93 | Job strain (ref = low) active: OR = 1.69 (0.62–2.87) Passive: OR = 2.82 (1.34–5.96) high: OR = 2.60 (1.26–5.34) Job control (ref high) low control: OR = 2.09 (1.02–4.30) Job demands (ref = low) High demands: OR = 1.76 (0.94–3.30) | Sex, age, socioeconomic position, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, obesity |
Lund et al., 2001, Denmark [68] | Job demands, Decision authority; Social support; Skill discretion (JCQ, 20 items) | Waste collectors (2412) and municipal workers (1460) in Denmark. N = 2.618 male workers | Disability pension, or sick leave benefits >2 months, self reported, n = 67 | Skill discretion (ref = high quartile) Mid 2 quartile: OR = 1.68 (0.74–3.82) Mid1 quartile: OR = 1.25 (0.49–3.10) Low quartile: OR = 2.70 (1.10–6.70) Insignificant results for Job demands, Decision authority and Social support (estimate not reported). | Sex, age, mechanical exposure, asthma, chronic bronchitis, musculoskeletal disorders, smoking status, Body Mass Index (BMI), alcohol consumption, marital status |
Lund et al., 2003, Denmark [63] | Decision authority; job demands; social support; conflict at work; employee development; supplementary training (JCQ: 18 items) | General working population, n = 3318 | Disability pension awards, or sick leave benefits >10 weeks, registry, n = 77 | Decision authority: p > 0.05 Job demands: p > 0.05 Social support: p > 0.05 Conflict at work: p > 0.05 Employee development (ref = high) Medium: OR = 1.2 (0.62–2.14) Low: OR = 2.2 (1.11–4.39) Supplementary training (ref = high) Medium: OR = 1.7 (0.77–3.90) Low: OR = 2.4 (1.11–5.26) | Sex, age, marital status, health, BMI, smoking, company size, public or private sector |
Mantyniemi et al., 2012, Finland [47] | Job strain based on work unit and occupational title, respectively (derived from JCQ; conflicting demands not included) (no test of demands and control) | Public sector employees, n = 69,842 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 2572 | Men All cause disability: work unit based HR = 1.28 (1.07–1.53)/occupation based HR = 1.40 (1.15–1.71) Musculoskeletal diseases: work unit based HR = 1.66 (1.26–2.20)/occupation based HR = 2.41 (1.81–3.21) Depression: work unit based HR = 1.59 (1.03–2.47)/occupation based HR = 1.30 (0.78–2.16) Coronary heart disease: work unit based HR = 2.14 (1.01–4.50)/occupation based HR = 2.37 (1.10–5.10) Women All cause disability: work unit based HR = 1.07 (0.98–1.17)/occupation based HR = 1.17 (1.04–1.31) Musculoskeletal diseases: work unit based HR = 1.48 (1.31–1.67)/occupation based HR = 2.21 (1.91–2.57) Depression: work unit based HR = 1.15 (0.97–1.37)/occupation based HR = 1.24 (1.00–1.53) Coronary heart disease: work unit based HR = 1.18 (0.57–2.45)/occupation based HR = 0.98 (0.39–2.47) | Sex, age, health status, socioeconomic position |
Robroek et al., 2013, European countries [73] | High time pressure (single item); low decision latitude (JCQ: two items, one on authority and one on skill discretion); low rewards (JCQ) | General working population >49 y, n = 4923 | Disability pension awards, questionnaire, n = 6.2 per 1000 person-years | High time pressure HR = 1.14 (0.77–1.70) Low decision latitude : HR = 1.77 (1.10–2.84) Low rewards HR = 1.44 (0.96–2.16) | Sex, age, health status, physical work exposure, education, marital status, BMI, smoking |
Ropponen et al., 2012, Finland [72] | Work-time schedules (day, shift, evening/night) | General working population (twins), n = 16,028 | Disability pension awards due to Low Back Diagnoses, registry, n = 470 | Men Day work = ref Shift work: HR = 1.36 (0.98–1.88) Evening/night work: HR = 0.62 (0.08–4.48) Women Day work = ref Shift work: HR = 0.92 (0.59–1.43) Evening/night work: HR = 0.1.52 (0.62–3.75) | Sex, age, Education, physical work exposure, physical activity, marital staus, BMI, smoking |
Ropponen et al., 2013, Sweden [79] | Job demands (5 items); job control (7 items); social support at work (4 items); job strain | Cohort of all Swedish twins born between 1928 and 1958, n = 42,715 | Disability pension awards due to musculoskeletal diagnoses, registry, n = 1774 | Job demands (range 1–10; high score is low) HR = 1.10 (1.02–1.20) Job control (range 1–10; high score is high) HR 0.93 (0.89–0.97) Social support (range 1–10; high score is high) HR = 1.08 (0.98–1.19) Job strain (ref = low) High strain HR = 0.93 (0.73–1.19) Active HR = 0.89 (0.75–1.07) Passive HR = 1.25 (1.07–1.46) ISO-strain HR = 1.27 (1.04–1.57) | Sex, age, education, married, children working at home |
Samuelsson et al., 2013, Sweden [49] | Job demands (continuous); job control (continuous); Social support (continuous); job strain (validated JEM, based on principal component factor analysis of the Swedish questionnaire items relating to work) | All twins born 1925–1958 in Sweden, n = 59,893 | Disability pension awards with mental diagnoses, registry, n = 7709 | Whole cohort Low job demands: HR = 1.07 (0.98–1.15) High job control: HR = 0.93 (0.89–0.97) High social support: HR = 1.12 (1.01–1.24) Job strain (ref = low strain) High: HR = 0.96 (0.75–1.22) Active: HR = 0.97 (0.81–1.16) Passive: HR = 1.26 (1.05–1.50) Iso-strain: HR = 1.41 (1.12–1.77) Twin cohort Low job demands: HR = 1.23 (1.06–1.43) High job control: HR = 0.91 (0.83–0.99) High social support: HR = 1.00 (0.79–1.23) Job strain (ref = low strain) High: HR = 0.65 (0.41–1.03) Active: HR = 0.78 (0.56–1.08) Passive: HR = 1.04 (0.76–1.44) Iso-strain: HR = 1.09 (0.76–1.44) | Sex, age, marital status, education, occupational class |
Sinokki et.al., 2010, Finland [53] | Social support at work, supervisor and coworkers (JCQ) | General working population, n = 3414 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 257 | Support from supervisor (ref. = high) Low: OR = 1.70 (1.21–2.38) Support from co-workers (ref. = high) Low: OR = 1.35 (0.86–2.14) | Sex, age, marital status, occupational grade, physical activity, BMI, alcohol consumption, smoking, and either physical illness, mental disorders, sleeping difficulties |
Sterud T. al., 2013, Norway [80] | Job demands (single item), Job control (three items), supportive leadership (three items), bullying/harassment (three items), monotonous work (single item) Some items have been tested for psychometric quality | Representative cohort from the general working population, n = 6745 | Disability pension awards, questionnaire, n = 176 | Job demands OR = 0.82 (0.53–1.26) Job control OR = 0.84 (0.54–1.30) Supportive leadership OR = 1.61 (1.02–2.56) Bulling/harassment OR = 1.52 (0.78–2.93) Monotonous work OR = 1.53 (1.09–2.16) | Sex, age, psychological distress, mechanical factors at work |
Støver et al., 2013, Norway [81] | Cumulative summation index of 11 psychosocial work exposure questions | Cohort of all individuals aged 40–42 years in 1988–1989, living in Nordland county, Norway, n = 5749 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 1944 | Five point increase on the cumulative index for psychosocial work environment HR = 1.22 (1.04–1.44) | Sex, age, baseline health, smoking, alcohol consumption, education, physical-, chemical- and mechanical work exposures |
Thielen et al., 2013, Denmark [82] | Amount of work (three items, COPSOQ) | General working population, n = 5758 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 2201 | Amount of work (ref = low) Middle HR = 0.95 (0.68–1.31) High HR = 0.67 (0.44–1.01) Mental demands/depression (ref = low/low) High/low HR = 0.66 (0.41–1.05) Low/High HR = 2.45 (1.71–3.52) High/High HR = 2.08 (1.26–3.40) | Sex, age, marital status, education, alcohol consumption, smoking, obesity, muscular-skeletal pain, depressive symptoms |
Tüchsen et al., 2008, Denmark [64] | Shift workers compared with permanent day workers | General working population sample, n = 3980 women and 4025 men | Disability pension, registry, n = 253 women and 173 men | Women Shift work HR = 1.34 (1.02–1.75) Men Shift work HR = 1.18 (0.96–1.46) | Sex, age, general health, SES, BMI, smoking status and ergonomic exposure |
Vahtera et al., 2005, Finland [43] | Downsizing (ref = reductions in personnel less than 8% vs. minor downsizing (8–18%) and major downsizing (more than 18%). | Municipal employees, n = 5043 men and 14,239 women | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 68 men and 155 women | Men All cause disability: HR = 1.46 (1.02–2.08) Psychiatric diseases: HR = 1.26 (0.70–2.26 Musculoskeletal diseases: HR = 1.29 (0.65–2.59) Other causes: HR = 1.55 (1.10–2.19) Women All cause disability: HR = 1.81 (1.22–2.70) Psychiatric diseases: HR = 1.26 (0.63–2.54) Musculoskeletal diseases: HR = 1.81 (0.94–3.90) Other causes: HR = 1.89 (1.27–2.81) | Sex, age, occupational status, type of employment contract, and geographical area |
Vahtera, J. et al., 2010, Finland [51] | Self-assessed worktime control (7 items scale); Co-worker assessed worktime control (7 items scale) (Validated instrument) | Public sector employees, n = 30,700 | Disability pension awards, registry, n = 1178 | Self-assessed worktime control All: HR = 0.87 (0.80 to 0.94) Men: HR = 0.97 (0.82 to 1.15) Women: HR = 0.86 (0.78 to 0.94) Co-worker assessed worktime control All: HR = 0.76 (0.67 to 0.87) Men: HR = 0.94 (0.72 to 1.23) Women: HR = 0.71 (0.61 to 0.83) | Sex, age, socioeconomic status, work-related factors, health risk behavior, health indicators |
Virtanen et.al., 2010 UK [69] | Organizational change | Civil servants (office staff), n = 4682 | Retirement due to health reasons or left The Civil Service and subsequently classified themselves as long term sick, n = 239 | Organizational change (Yes vs. not planned) HR = 1.61 (1.23–2.10) | Sex, age, duration of employment, grad, perceived health, marital status, material problems, housing tenure, car access, long term illness, general health questionnaire |