Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Oct 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Oct 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Beckman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Oct 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Feb 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steve Allsop |
18 Feb 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Seth Ammerman |
29 Feb 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Moberg |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
19 May 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Moberg |
25 Aug 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Cook |
28 Sep 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Beckman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Penny Cook |
7 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Beckman |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
30 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Beckman |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Beckman |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
15 Dec 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Jan 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12889-016-3947-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.