Skip to main content

Table 8 Individual path coefficients for mediation analysis.

From: What explains the socioeconomic status gap in activity? Educational differences in determinants of physical activity and screentime

  Total effect on PA Variable - > PA SES - > Variable
  β CI95 β CI95 β CI95
Model 1: Capability
(R^2 = 0.29)
     
 SES 0.59 [0.28, 0.90] 0.23 [−0.04, 0.50]   
 Action planning    0.12 [−0.10, 0.34] 0.22 [0.04, 0.40]
 Coping planning    0.10 [−0.09, 0.30] 0.05 [−0.12, 0.22]
 Self-monitoring    0.48 [0.38, 0.58] 0.68 [0.40, 0.97]
Model 2: Opportunity
(R^2 = 0.13)
    
 SES 0.58 [0.26, 0.89] 0.38 [0.07, 0.69]   
 Access to facilities    0.00 [−0.10, 0.09] 0.14 [−0.14, 0.42]
 Material resources    0.15 [0.05, 0.24] 0.48 [0.19, 0.76]
 Injunctive norm    0.10 [0.00, 0.20] 0.64 [0.36, 0.92]
 Descriptive norm    0.14 [0.01, 0.27] 0.26 [0.02, 0.49]
 Parental support    0.08 [−0.02, 0.18] 0.33 [0.02, 0.64]
 PE Autonomy support    0.11 [0.02, 0.20] 0.02 [−0.27, 0.30]
Model 3: Motivation
(R^2 = 0.32)
     
 SES 0.60 [0.29, 0.92] 0.30 [0.02, 0.57]   
 Affective attitude    0.03 [−0.09, 0.14] 0.48 [0.23, 0.74]
 Instrumental attitude    −0.07 [−0.21, 0.07] 0.26 [0.07, 0.44]
 Habit    0.15 [0.05, 0.25] 0.18 [−0.12, 0.48]
 Intention    0.30 [0.21, 0.39] 0.67 [0.35, 0.99]
 Negative OE    0.07 [−0.03, 0.17] −0.45 [−0.69,−0.22]
 PA identity    0.29 [0.17, 0.40] 0.46 [0.19, 0.72]
 Positive OE    −0.04 [−0.14, 0.06] 0.26 [0.01, 0.51]
 SE & PBC    −0.01 [−0.12, 0.09] 0.39 [0.14, 0.64]