Skip to main content

Table 8 Individual path coefficients for mediation analysis.

From: What explains the socioeconomic status gap in activity? Educational differences in determinants of physical activity and screentime

 

Total effect on PA

Variable - > PA

SES - > Variable

 

β

CI95

β

CI95

β

CI95

Model 1: Capability

(R^2 = 0.29)

     

 SES

0.59

[0.28, 0.90]

0.23

[−0.04, 0.50]

  

 Action planning

  

0.12

[−0.10, 0.34]

0.22

[0.04, 0.40]

 Coping planning

  

0.10

[−0.09, 0.30]

0.05

[−0.12, 0.22]

 Self-monitoring

  

0.48

[0.38, 0.58]

0.68

[0.40, 0.97]

Model 2: Opportunity

(R^2 = 0.13)

    

 SES

0.58

[0.26, 0.89]

0.38

[0.07, 0.69]

  

 Access to facilities

  

0.00

[−0.10, 0.09]

0.14

[−0.14, 0.42]

 Material resources

  

0.15

[0.05, 0.24]

0.48

[0.19, 0.76]

 Injunctive norm

  

0.10

[0.00, 0.20]

0.64

[0.36, 0.92]

 Descriptive norm

  

0.14

[0.01, 0.27]

0.26

[0.02, 0.49]

 Parental support

  

0.08

[−0.02, 0.18]

0.33

[0.02, 0.64]

 PE Autonomy support

  

0.11

[0.02, 0.20]

0.02

[−0.27, 0.30]

Model 3: Motivation

(R^2 = 0.32)

     

 SES

0.60

[0.29, 0.92]

0.30

[0.02, 0.57]

  

 Affective attitude

  

0.03

[−0.09, 0.14]

0.48

[0.23, 0.74]

 Instrumental attitude

  

−0.07

[−0.21, 0.07]

0.26

[0.07, 0.44]

 Habit

  

0.15

[0.05, 0.25]

0.18

[−0.12, 0.48]

 Intention

  

0.30

[0.21, 0.39]

0.67

[0.35, 0.99]

 Negative OE

  

0.07

[−0.03, 0.17]

−0.45

[−0.69,−0.22]

 PA identity

  

0.29

[0.17, 0.40]

0.46

[0.19, 0.72]

 Positive OE

  

−0.04

[−0.14, 0.06]

0.26

[0.01, 0.51]

 SE & PBC

  

−0.01

[−0.12, 0.09]

0.39

[0.14, 0.64]