Skip to main content

Table 2 Stratified regression models on the proportion of employed PwD by Districtc in India, 2001

From: Factors associated with persons with disability employment in India: a cross-sectional study

 

Model 1: Stratified

Model 2: Spatial Error Model

Variable

Rural

Urban

Rural

Urban

Constant

0.0090 (0.0211)

0.0230a (0.0101)

−0.0181 (0.0165)

−0.0114 (0.0084)

Movement

−0.0285 (0.0356)

0.1649b (0.0315)

0.3161b (0.0412)

0.4776b (0.0340)

Mental

−0.7955b (0.1000)

0.2293 (0.0646)

−0.4046b (0.1030)

0.3778b (0.0620)

Sight

0.2012b (0.0352)

0.4575 (0.0322)

0.3899b (0.0350)

0.6200b (0.0308)

Female

0.629b (0.0547)

−0.4551b (0.0428)

0.2529b (0.0580)

−0.5614b (0.0399)

Illiterate

−0.0387 (0.0296)

−0.2651b (0.0273)

0.0350 (0.0297)

−0.1225b (0.0271)

Spatial Error

  

Yes

Yes

State Fixed Effects (No. Categories)

Yes(21)

Yes (21)

Yes (21)

Yes (21)

R-Squared

0.4753

0.6695

0.6967

0.7800

No. Obs.

843

843

843

843

Global Moran’s I

19.0492b

14.6926b

  

Lagrange Multiplier (lag)

96.1904b

64.9307b

  

Robust LM (lag)

13.0312b

13.8244b

  

Lagrange Multiplier (error)

321.4412b

136.9104b

  

Robust LM (error)

136.9104b

239.0752b

  

Breusch Pagan-Test

  

323.7729b

392.6021b

Likelihood Ratio Test

  

350.1907b

252.7653b

  1. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses
  2. a, b indicates significance at the 95 %, and 99 % level, respectively
  3. cTotal number of persons with disability in India in 2001 = 22 million persons or 2.1 % of the total population