Skip to main content

Table 2 Stratified regression models on the proportion of employed PwD by Districtc in India, 2001

From: Factors associated with persons with disability employment in India: a cross-sectional study

  Model 1: Stratified Model 2: Spatial Error Model
Variable Rural Urban Rural Urban
Constant 0.0090 (0.0211) 0.0230a (0.0101) −0.0181 (0.0165) −0.0114 (0.0084)
Movement −0.0285 (0.0356) 0.1649b (0.0315) 0.3161b (0.0412) 0.4776b (0.0340)
Mental −0.7955b (0.1000) 0.2293 (0.0646) −0.4046b (0.1030) 0.3778b (0.0620)
Sight 0.2012b (0.0352) 0.4575 (0.0322) 0.3899b (0.0350) 0.6200b (0.0308)
Female 0.629b (0.0547) −0.4551b (0.0428) 0.2529b (0.0580) −0.5614b (0.0399)
Illiterate −0.0387 (0.0296) −0.2651b (0.0273) 0.0350 (0.0297) −0.1225b (0.0271)
Spatial Error    Yes Yes
State Fixed Effects (No. Categories) Yes(21) Yes (21) Yes (21) Yes (21)
R-Squared 0.4753 0.6695 0.6967 0.7800
No. Obs. 843 843 843 843
Global Moran’s I 19.0492b 14.6926b   
Lagrange Multiplier (lag) 96.1904b 64.9307b   
Robust LM (lag) 13.0312b 13.8244b   
Lagrange Multiplier (error) 321.4412b 136.9104b   
Robust LM (error) 136.9104b 239.0752b   
Breusch Pagan-Test    323.7729b 392.6021b
Likelihood Ratio Test    350.1907b 252.7653b
  1. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses
  2. a, b indicates significance at the 95 %, and 99 % level, respectively
  3. cTotal number of persons with disability in India in 2001 = 22 million persons or 2.1 % of the total population