Table 4 Within and between city differences in dog walker’s neighborhood perceptions by gender
All Dog walkers (n = 623) | San Diego Dog walkers (n = 142) | Portland Dog walkers (n = 123) | Nashville Dog walkers (n = 155) | Perth Dog walkers (n = 203) | Significant between city differences (All dog walkers)2 | Significant between city differences (Female dog walkers)3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall % | OR1 (95 % CI) | Overall % | OR1 (95 % CI) | Overall % | OR1 (95 % CI) | Overall % | OR1 (95 % CI) | Overall % | OR1 (95 % CI) | p-value | p-value | |
Feel safer walking with dog | 58.6 | 2.49 (1.76,3.53) | 57.7 | 2.54 (1.09,5.93) | 58.5 | 4.17 (1.57,11.09) | 58.7 | 0.97 (0.45,2.07) | 59.1 | 6.07 (2.99,12.33) | 0.971 | 0.277 |
Got to know neighborhood through walking dog | 77.4 | 0.74 (0.49,1.11) | 83.1 | 0.65 (0.20, 2.09) | 81.3 | 1.60 (0.49,5.24) | 71.0 | 0.69 (0.29,1.66) | 75.9 | 0.50 (0.23,1.08) | 0.010 PE > NV | 0.024 PE < PL |