Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Sep 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Mabry |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Sep 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 16 Nov 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Keegan |
| 16 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paulo Guerra |
| 16 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gemma Morgan |
| 7 Feb 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Mabry |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Feb 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 10 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paulo Guerra |
| 14 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Keegan |
| 29 Jun 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Mabry |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Jun 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Jul 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Keegan |
| 25 Aug 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Mabry |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Aug 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Sep 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Sep 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12889-016-3642-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.