Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression Analyses of the implementation of management of hypertension patients

From: The relation between health insurance and management of hypertension in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study

 

Blood pressure measurementa

Publicity of hypertension prevention knowledgeb

Antihypertensive drugsc

Blood pressure under control d

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

p value

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

p value

Health insurance (vs UEBMI)

 URBMI

0.99 (0.84,1.18)

0.924

1.28 (1.12,1.45)

<0.001

0.94 (0.79,1.13)

0.510

1.22 (1.05,1.42)

0.015

 NCMS

0.66 (0.54,0.80)

<0.001

2.36 (1.96,2.85)

<0.001

1.28 (1.00,1.65)

0.052

1.33 (1.09,1.62)

0.008

 Others

0.86 (0.49,1.51)

0.595

0.93 (0.61,1.40)

0.715

0.79 (0.44,1.39)

0.407

1.21 (0.71,2.07)

0.558

Variables weren’t balanced after implementation of the PS

 Age

1.01 (1.01,1.02)

<0.001

1.01 (1.01,1.02)

<0.001

1.01 (1.01,1.02)

<0.001

1.00 (0.97,1.01)

0.411

 BMI

1.02 (1.00,1.04)

0.073

1.01 (0.99,1.03)

0.239

1.07 (1.04,1.10)

<0.001

1.00 (0.98,1.02)

0.988

 Sex (Male vs Female)

0.97 (0.81,1.17)

0.756

0.68 (0.58,0.80)

<0.001

1.10 (0.90,1.35)

0.366

1.15 (0.97,1.36)

0.121

 Household type (Agricultural vs Non-agricultural)

1.03 (0.87,1.22)

0.7561

1.08 (0.95,1.23)

0.220

1.14 (0.95,1.37)

0.161

0.79 (0.68,0.92)

0.032

Drink (vs not drink)

 less than 1 time in a week

0.72 (0.57,0.90)

0.004

1.03 (0.86,1.24)

0.752

0.65 (0.51,0.83)

<0.001

0.68 (0.55,0.84)

<0.001

 1–2 times in a week

0.73 (0.50,1.09)

0.123

1.16 (0.84,1.59)

0.373

0.65 (0.44,0.96)

0.029

0.61 (0.43,0.87)

0.006

 More than 2 times a week

0.64 (0.45,0.89)

0.009

0.83 (0.64,1.08)

0.161

0.59 (0.42,0.83)

0.002

0.92 (0.65,1.29)

0.612

Physical exercises status (vs more than 6 times a week)

 3–5 times a week

0.87 (0.67,1.12)

0.267

0.88 (0.73,1.06)

0.183

0.71 (0.54,0.92)

0.010

0.75 (0.60,0.94)

0.011

 1–2 times a week

1.24 (0.90,1.72)

0.188

0.86 (0.7,1.07)

0.170

0.54 (0.41,0.72)

<0.001

1.06 (0.81,1.40)

0.669

 Less than 1 time a week

0.69 (0.47,1.02)

0.061

0.6 (0.45,0.79)

<0.001

0.93 (0.59,1.46)

0.749

1.14 (0.76,1.71)

0.538

 Never

0.63 (0.53,0.75)

<0.001

0.91 (0.8,1.05)

0.190

0.76 (0.62,0.93)

0.009

0.73 (0.62,0.86)

0.001

Education (vs less than high school)

 high school graduate

1.81 (1.49,2.20)

<0.001

1.04 (0.91,1.18)

0.565

0.87 (0.72,1.03)

0.154

1.54 (1.29,1.82)

<0.001

 higher than high school

1.24 (0.85,1.81)

0.270

0.98 (0.76,1.27)

0.882

0.75 (0.52,1.06)

0.104

1.07 (0.77,1.74)

0.700

  1. Note:
  2. UEBMI the urban employee basic health insurance scheme, URBMI the urban resident basic medical insurance, NCMS the new cooperative medical scheme, PS propensity score
  3. These confounders in the outcome model are those variables are not balanced after implementation of the propensity score
  4. a patients measured their blood pressure within a month;
  5. b patients achieved publicity of precautionary knowledge on hypertension within three months;
  6. c patients took antihypertensive drugs every day;
  7. d patient had their blood pressure under control
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us