Skip to main content

Table 1 Future HIV financing options for PNFPs

From: The future of financing for HIV services in Uganda and the wider sub-Saharan Africa region: should we ask patients to contribute to the cost of their care?

Option

Current status

Government action required

PNFP action required

Direct Government funding of services and/or centralized HIV/AIDS Fund [2, 6, 10]

Inadequate resources and inadequate budget allocation

• Streamlined, transparent public- private partnership (PPP) frameworks for health

• Long term budget commitment

• Engagement of donors for medium term budget support

• Innovative tax/revenue collection and allocation measures

• Stronger accountability and performance/quality measurement systems

• Systems to meet minimum public private partnership guidelines

• Less vertical /“silo” based programs

• Health system wide capacity building

• Quality Assurance and Performance measurement systems

National Health Insurance Scheme [6, 11, 13]

In discussion

• Stakeholder involvement; generating a consensus on nature and scope of coverage

• Fund management capacity

• Governance, accountability and confidence building

• Legislation and regulation

• Definition and implementation of systems to meet minimum NHIS requirements for PNFP providers

• Capacity building for NHIS compliance

• Quality Assurance and Performance measurement systems

Out-of-Pocket Service

Currently funds 50 % of health care [32]

• Stronger accountability and performance/quality measurement systems

• Direct cash transfers

• Quality Assurance and Performance measurement systems

Private Insurance [16, 17]

Very low coverage, inadequate regulation

• Stronger Regulation

• Stronger accountability and performance/quality measurement systems

• Creating an attractive business proposition for private insurance firms

• Creating systems to meet minimum private health insurance company requirements

Community Health Insurance Schemes [11]

Very low coverage, inadequate regulation

• Legislation and regulation

• Community engagement and confidence building

• Community accountability mechanisms

• Differentiated care for scheme members

Co-Payment to subsidize overall costs of care

Used mainly by faith based organizations and NGOs, but little documentation on coverage and best practices

• No additional legislation and/or regulation

• Creating capacity to manage and report separate (paying and non-paying client) income streams

• Mobilizing paying and non-paying client support

• Mobilizing external stakeholder (eg donor and government) support

• Maintenance of standard quality care for all clients